SC hands Mayawati victory

The Supreme Court on Wednesday gave the go-ahead for the creation of a district carved out of Amethi Lok Sabha constituency represented by Rahul Gandhi and named after dalit icon Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj.
Setting aside the August 18 interim order of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court, which stayed the UP government’s July 1 notification for the creation of a new district called Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Nagar till March 31 next year, a top court bench comprising Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice H.L. Gokhale described the high court order as an act of judicial impropriety.
The top court passed the order on the ground that an earlier petition challenging its decision was dismissed by the same high court on August 11.
The bench said, “Judicial propriety demanded that the high court should have considered the final judgment of August 11. It could not have taken a different stand.” A division bench of the high court comprising Justice Uma Nath Singh and Justice Satish Chandra had dismissed a petition on August 11 challenging the creation of the new district.

Comments

In case of 'judicial

In case of 'judicial impropriety' pointed out by top court bench, what action the 'erring judges' will face ? Any reprieve affecting their promotion or some such corrective'punishment ?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

India

“It went too soon, too soon That age when cats fiddled And cows jumped over the moon...” From Tension Nahin Leneka by Bachchoo On the strength of a few series of situation comedy for TV and the fact that I have written material for stand-up comics and parodists, I am invited to participate in a seminar on comedy at a German university. The particular department of the university has post-graduate students who learn through the medium of English and in the case of this seminar have chosen the option of what universities call “post-colonial” studies.

The year is still new, and we are full of good intentions. This week we learnt that the government’s sporadic efforts — mostly weak and often mindless — to change anti-dowry laws for better implementation may include laying down rules on how much you can spend on weddings. The Planning Commission’s Working Group on Women’s Agency and Empowerment has recommended an income-linked ceiling on marriage expenditure, which would include gifts as well as celebratory feasts. In short, if you try to spend beyond your means on your daughter or son’s wedding, you’d better be ready for the dowry inspector.