Tuesday, Jul 07, 2020 | Last Update : 04:18 PM IST

104th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2119871152629026 Tamil Nadu114978665711571 Delhi100823720883115 Gujarat36858263231967 Uttar Pradesh2770718761785 Telangana2390212703295 Karnataka234749849372 West Bengal2212614711757 Rajasthan2026315965459 Andhra Pradesh200198920239 Haryana1750413335276 Madhya Pradesh1528411579617 Bihar12140901497 Assam11737743414 Odisha9526648648 Jammu and Kashmir84295255132 Punjab64914494132 Kerala5623334128 Chhatisgarh3207257814 Uttarakhand3161258642 Jharkhand2815204520 Goa181310617 Tripura158012061 Manipur13897330 Himachal Pradesh107074610 Puducherry101148014 Nagaland5782280 Chandigarh4874016 Arunachal Pradesh269781 Mizoram191130 Sikkim125650 Meghalaya80431
  HC impleads students in copyright case

HC impleads students in copyright case

AGE CORRESPONDENT
Published : Mar 14, 2013, 12:25 am IST
Updated : Mar 14, 2013, 12:25 am IST

In an ongoing case in the Delhi high court, where a consortium of publishers, namely Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis Group, filed a suit against Delhi University and M/S Rameshwari Photocopier (the licensed photocopy shop at Delhi School of Economics) alleging copyright infringement, the plea for impleadment filed by the Association of Students for Equitable Access to Knowledge (ASEAK) in the lawsuit was accepted by the court recently.

In an ongoing case in the Delhi high court, where a consortium of publishers, namely Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis Group, filed a suit against Delhi University and M/S Rameshwari Photocopier (the licensed photocopy shop at Delhi School of Economics) alleging copyright infringement, the plea for impleadment filed by the Association of Students for Equitable Access to Knowledge (ASEAK) in the lawsuit was accepted by the court recently. The publishers had claimed that photocopying of prescribed study material constituted an infringement of their copyright and claimed damages in excess of `60 lakhs. To the objections raised by the publishers’ lawyer to ASEAK’s impleadment, the high court said, “that the presence of the applicant is necessary and proper for adjudication of the present suit”. In October 2012, the HC had passed an interim injunction staying further photocopying of “course packs” which are essentially compilation of prescribed reading materials. The Indian Copyright Act 1957 makes for exceptions to copyright infringement in Section 52, Article (h) of the Act, which states: “(h) the reproduction of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work (i) by a teacher or a pupil in the course of instruction; or (ii) as part of the questions to be answered in an examination; or (iii) in answers to such questions” does not amount to an infringement of copyright. ASEAK will seek a revocation of the interim order and will argue to defend the educational exception in favour of the interests of the student community.