Wednesday, Jul 15, 2020 | Last Update : 03:40 AM IST

112th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra26766514900710695 Tamil Nadu147324973102099 Delhi115346932363446 Karnataka4407717391846 Gujarat43723305552070 Uttar Pradesh3972424981983 Telangana3774524840375 Andhra Pradesh3301917467408 West Bengal3283819931980 Rajasthan2557119169524 Haryana2262817090312 Madhya Pradesh1900513575673 Bihar1885313019143 Assam178081217451 Odisha14280986496 Jammu and Kashmir111736223195 Kerala8931443835 Punjab85115663213 Chhatisgarh4379327520 Jharkhand4225242836 Uttarakhand3686286750 Goa2753160718 Tripura218315382 Manipur167210200 Puducherry153182918 Himachal Pradesh130993810 Nagaland8963460 Chandigarh60044610 Arunachal Pradesh3871453 Meghalaya318462 Mizoram2381590 Sikkim211860
  Metros   Mumbai  28 Jul 2018  Bombay HC directs censor board on certificates for subtitles

Bombay HC directs censor board on certificates for subtitles

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Jul 28, 2018, 1:53 am IST
Updated : Jul 28, 2018, 1:53 am IST

The film body alleged that CBFC move is to harass producers and extort more money.

Bombay high court
 Bombay high court

Mumbai: The Bombay high court on Friday directed the Central Film Certification Board (CBFC) to file its reply within two weeks in a petition filed by the Indian Motion Picture Producers Association (IMPPA), challenging the censor board’s direction to submit subtitles of a movie for censorship. IMPAA approached the high court, claiming that the new rule introduced by the CBFC was allegedly arbitrary. The petition has sought the high court to quash this procedure.

 According to petition filed by IMPPA, on April 27, the petitioner association received a notice from the CBFC, which said the producers of a film are required to obtain a s-
eparate censorship certificate for the film’s sub-titles. “As per the notice, the producers have to first obtain certificate for the movie and thereafter when sub-titling is done by any producer in a different languages like Marathi, English, Gujarati and Tamil they are also required to obtain fresh censorship from the CBFC,” the petition said.

According to the petition, earlier certification was required only for the movie from the CBFC and there was no requirement or practice of certification for the subtitles.

CBFC lawyer Advait Sethna on Friday told the court that the direction to seek separate certification for subtitles was to ensure that producers do not add or alter the same after getting censorship certificate for the movie.

A division bench, headed by Justice R. M. Borde directed Sethna to file an affidavit responding to the petition within two weeks.

Counsel Ashok Sarogi told the court films’ releases are being delayed.

Tags: bombay high court, cbfc