Monday, Sep 21, 2020 | Last Update : 03:21 AM IST

180th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra118801585793332216 Andhra Pradesh6177765307115302 Tamil Nadu5364774812738751 Karnataka5113454048417922 Uttar Pradesh3362942632884771 Delhi2347011981034877 West Bengal2155801870614183 Telangana1713061397001033 Odisha167161133466722 Bihar164224149722855 Assam150349121610528 Kerala12221687341490 Gujarat119088999083271 Rajasthan109088906851293 Haryana103773816901069 Madhya Pradesh97906743981877 Punjab90032658182646 Chhatisgarh7777541111628 Jharkhand6710052807590 Jammu and Kashmir5971138521951 Uttarakhand3713924810460 Goa2678320844327 Puducherry2142816253431 Tripura2069612956222 Himachal Pradesh11190691997 Chandigarh92566062106 Manipur8430653951 Arunachal Pradesh6851496713 Nagaland5306407910 Meghalaya4356234232 Sikkim2119178923 Mizoram15069490
  Metros   Mumbai  28 Apr 2017  Bombay HC okays intimation sent via email, WhatsApp

Bombay HC okays intimation sent via email, WhatsApp

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Apr 28, 2017, 4:50 am IST
Updated : Apr 28, 2017, 4:50 am IST

The court said that as the respondents knew of the case through WhatsApp, it was sufficient for the case to progress.

A grab of Kannada movie Pushpaka Vimana.
 A grab of Kannada movie Pushpaka Vimana.

Mumbai: Based on proof of notice being served through WhatsApp and email, the Bombay high court on March 23 had granted stay to the release and airing of Kannada movie Pushpaka Vimana that the applicants claimed violated their copyrights.

The HC accepted the contentions of the applicants that the opponents had evaded service of notice through hand delivery and courier and hence they were sent the same through WhatsApp and email. The court said that as the respondents knew of the case through WhatsApp, it was sufficient for the case to progress. However, court officials clarified that the same could not be construed as a ‘summons’ and it had to be served in the designated format.

 

When The Asian Age contacted HC officials for clarity whether it had accepted WhatsApp or email as legitimate method of serving notice or summons, an official refuted it and said, “The order has been misinterpreted and the court is not advocating serving of notice through social media. Serving of summons has to be done through established procedure.”

While hearing a notice of motion in a suit filed by a Kross Television India Pvt Ltd against Vikhyat Chitra Production, Justice G.S. Patel was informed by Dr Birendra Saraf, the counsel for Kross that they had tried to serve notice of the suit and the motion to Vikhyat but they had evaded accepting the notice either through courier or hand delivery.

 

Hence, his clients had found Vikhyat’s address and contact number and  sent him a WhatsApp message.

Tags: bombay high court, whatsapp, email, pushpaka vimana
Location: India, Maharashtra, Mumbai (Bombay)