Friday, Jul 10, 2020 | Last Update : 07:29 PM IST

107th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2305991272599667 Tamil Nadu122350741671700 Delhi104864781993213 Gujarat38419273131994 Uttar Pradesh3115620331845 Telangana2953617279324 Karnataka2887711878471 West Bengal2482316291827 Andhra Pradesh2381412154277 Rajasthan2221216877489 Haryana1936414505287 Madhya Pradesh1634112232634 Assam14033872724 Bihar139789792109 Odisha11201740767 Jammu and Kashmir92615567149 Punjab71404945183 Kerala6535370828 Chhatisgarh3526283514 Uttarakhand3305267246 Jharkhand3192217022 Goa203912078 Tripura177313241 Manipur14357930 Puducherry120061916 Himachal Pradesh110182510 Nagaland6733030 Chandigarh5234037 Arunachal Pradesh2871092 Mizoram2031430 Sikkim134710 Meghalaya113451
  Metros   Mumbai  28 Apr 2017  Bombay HC okays intimation sent via email, WhatsApp

Bombay HC okays intimation sent via email, WhatsApp

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Apr 28, 2017, 4:50 am IST
Updated : Apr 28, 2017, 4:50 am IST

The court said that as the respondents knew of the case through WhatsApp, it was sufficient for the case to progress.

A grab of Kannada movie Pushpaka Vimana.
 A grab of Kannada movie Pushpaka Vimana.

Mumbai: Based on proof of notice being served through WhatsApp and email, the Bombay high court on March 23 had granted stay to the release and airing of Kannada movie Pushpaka Vimana that the applicants claimed violated their copyrights.

The HC accepted the contentions of the applicants that the opponents had evaded service of notice through hand delivery and courier and hence they were sent the same through WhatsApp and email. The court said that as the respondents knew of the case through WhatsApp, it was sufficient for the case to progress. However, court officials clarified that the same could not be construed as a ‘summons’ and it had to be served in the designated format.

When The Asian Age contacted HC officials for clarity whether it had accepted WhatsApp or email as legitimate method of serving notice or summons, an official refuted it and said, “The order has been misinterpreted and the court is not advocating serving of notice through social media. Serving of summons has to be done through established procedure.”

While hearing a notice of motion in a suit filed by a Kross Television India Pvt Ltd against Vikhyat Chitra Production, Justice G.S. Patel was informed by Dr Birendra Saraf, the counsel for Kross that they had tried to serve notice of the suit and the motion to Vikhyat but they had evaded accepting the notice either through courier or hand delivery.

Hence, his clients had found Vikhyat’s address and contact number and  sent him a WhatsApp message.

Tags: bombay high court, whatsapp, email, pushpaka vimana
Location: India, Maharashtra, Mumbai (Bombay)