Sunday, May 31, 2020 | Last Update : 08:19 PM IST

68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100

Bombay HC fines Mhada for encroaching Juhu open spaces

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Jul 20, 2017, 1:16 am IST
Updated : Jul 20, 2017, 1:16 am IST

The court also pointed out that MHADA had made some mistakes in the layout plan it had submitted to the BMC.

The petitioners declined to accept the costs imposed by the court and told the court that the amount should be donated to the State Legal Aid Fund.
 The petitioners declined to accept the costs imposed by the court and told the court that the amount should be donated to the State Legal Aid Fund.

Mumbai: The Bombay high court on Wednesday imposed a cost of Rs 2 lakh each on the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), a private trust and two housing societies for usurping two plots reserved as gardens in Juhu for constructing residential complexes.

A division bench of justices B.R. Gavai and Riyaz Chagla was hearing a petition by city-based NGO, Save Open Spaces against a March 2017 order of MHADA wherein it leased the plots to the trust and societies despite the reservations. MHADA had passed an order to execute lease deeds of two plots admeasuring 2,000 sq meters and 1,687 sq meters in favour of Juhuraj society and Juhu Lifestyle society as nominees of Anjuman Trust.  The petition prayed for quashing the MHADA order and passing a declaration that the two plots were necessarily required to be kept as open space for garden.

After hearing the prayer, the bench observed, "As it is, the city is having very few open spaces, which are the lungs of the city. We have no hesitation in holding that an attempt to destroy the open spaces meant for garden with ulterior motive would be violative of the doctrine of public trust." It further chided MHADA for colluding with the trust and the societies to carry out the illegal act and said that the hasty manner in which the lease was executed was suspicious.

The court also pointed out that MHADA had made some mistakes in the layout plan it had submitted to the BMC in 1999 after which the land grabbers came up with the idea for usurping the two plots. The court also noted the role of S.S. Zende, former vice-president and CEO of MHADA in facilitating the lease despite a letter from MHADA to the BMC requesting to rectify the mistake in the layout plan. After quashing the MHADA order, the court imposed a cost of Rs 2 lakh each on MHADA, the trust and the societies ordered for the two plots to be kept as an open garden space and said no construction can be permitted on these two plots.

The petitioners declined to accept the costs imposed by the court and told the court that the amount should be donated to the State Legal Aid Fund.

Tags: bombay high court, mhada
Location: India, Maharashtra, Mumbai (Bombay)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT