Tuesday, Jul 07, 2020 | Last Update : 03:13 AM IST

104th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2119871152629026 Tamil Nadu114978665711571 Delhi100823720883115 Gujarat36858263231967 Uttar Pradesh2770718761785 Telangana2390212703295 Karnataka234749849372 West Bengal2212614711757 Rajasthan2026315965459 Andhra Pradesh200198920239 Haryana1750413335276 Madhya Pradesh1528411579617 Bihar12140901497 Assam11737743414 Odisha9526648648 Jammu and Kashmir84295255132 Punjab64914494132 Kerala5623334128 Chhatisgarh3207257814 Uttarakhand3161258642 Jharkhand2815204520 Goa181310617 Tripura158012061 Manipur13897330 Himachal Pradesh107074610 Puducherry101148014 Nagaland5782280 Chandigarh4874016 Arunachal Pradesh269781 Mizoram191130 Sikkim125650 Meghalaya80431
  India   Madras HC stay on Tamil Nadu temple dress code

Madras HC stay on Tamil Nadu temple dress code

AGE CORRESPONDENT
Published : Jan 12, 2016, 6:21 am IST
Updated : Jan 12, 2016, 6:21 am IST

The Madurai bench of the Madras high court on Monday granted an interim stay of a single judge’s order directing the TN government to implement the dress code for men, women and children for entering

The Madurai bench of the Madras high court on Monday granted an interim stay of a single judge’s order directing the TN government to implement the dress code for men, women and children for entering temples administered by Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments department, till January 18. A division bench of Justices V. Ramasubramanian and N. Kirubakaran passed the interim order on an appeal by the Tamil Nadu government and two women’s organisations against the November 2015 order.

Advocate-general A.L. Somayaji told the court that the imposition of a dress code by the single judge using his discretionary power was unwarranted when these temples had already implemented various restrictions including dress codes as per the customary and traditional practices following the Tamil Nadu Temple Entry Authorisation Act, 1947. Moreover, the law also permitted individual temple management to prescribe dress codes as their custom, he said.

 

When Justice Kirubakaran asked as to why the discretionary power of judges guaranteed under Article 226 of the Constitution was being questioned, advocate U. Nirmala Rani, appearing for All-India Democratic Women’s Association said, “We agree that orders can be passed using the discretionary power of judges, but there should be some objective ground for it.” But in this case, there was no objective condition to use the discretionary power of the judge, she claimed. The original case is a writ petition seeking permission for cultural programmes in view of a temple festival in Tiruchy district.

Referring to the single judge’s mention of dress code followed in Muslim religion, she said, “Indian women are not living in Afghanistan and Pakistan where women are forced to cover from head to toe. Even there, women’s organisations are fighting against the dress code,” she said.

The single judge’s order violated constitutional rights of citizens to worship in a dress of their personal choice, she said. Advocate A. Rajini, appearing for Southern Districts Women’s Federation, also argued against the order.

As more prefer to implead themselves in the case, the Bench granted the interim stay.

Location: India, Tamil Nadu, Madurai