Tuesday, Aug 11, 2020 | Last Update : 07:12 PM IST

140th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra52451335842118050 Tamil Nadu3028752446755041 Andhra Pradesh2355251456362116 Karnataka182354991263312 Delhi1461341316574131 Uttar Pradesh126722767212120 West Bengal98459671202059 Bihar8274154139450 Telangana8075157586637 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3433121832109 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland30119738 Arunachal Pradesh223115923 Chandigarh1595100425 Meghalaya11154986 Sikkim9105101 Mizoram6203230
  Entertainment   In Other News  12 Sep 2017  Blocked till further notice

Blocked till further notice

Published : Sep 12, 2017, 12:16 am IST
Updated : Sep 12, 2017, 12:16 am IST

Artist and filmmaker Gautam Benegal was temporarily banned from Facebook for sharing an article.

Artist and filmmaker Gautam Benegal
 Artist and filmmaker Gautam Benegal

When browsing through social media, every once in a while there will be a post that you will disagree with. Sometimes, one disagrees strongly enough to express their opinion in the comments section. This is followed by a back and forth of information, which both parties could disagree to or agree to. However, sometimes, there is more than mere disagreement — a disapproval that offends you and without thinking, you report the post.

Artist, filmmaker and writer Gautam Benegal bore the brunt of a similar situation. When the social networking giant Facebook blocked him for a week, at first, he didn’t quite understand why. Soon, it was brought to his notice that the reason Facebook blocked him from accessing his account was because of a politically inclined post he shared earlier that week — shared, not created. “I had just shared a post originally created by someone else. I found it interesting and didn’t think that sharing it would create this big an issue for me,” he shares. Gautam reveals the post was about identifying a Hindutva sympathiser. He realises that it must only have been a “Hindutva sympathiser” who would have reported him. What Gautam finds most confusing is what part of the article could have been so offensive to someone that they reported it. “The article was about number of ways to identify a Hindutva sympathiser. And mind you, there was nothing vulgar or abusive in the article,” he points out.


Still perplexed about the issue, Gautam decided to write to Facebook complaining about the incident. “I was asked to write to Facebook and when I did, I didn’t get any response,” he shares, adding that he ended up writing to them twice but in vain. Gautam is blocked from using Facebook till Thursday.

The artist fails to understand the threshold of people when it comes to being intolerant about things like these. “Facebook is filled with people sharing posts about hate speech, racism, bigotry, but that goes unreported,” he shrugs.

Pointing out that since Facebook largely runs on an algorithm, it makes it difficult for them to gauge the posts. “When one reports something or someone, the assessment of that post is done by an algorithm. Therefore, the content of that post doesn’t matter — what matters is how many people have reported it,” he explains, adding that more the number of people reporting a post, the quickly it is taken down. At the time of going to print, Facebook had not yet clarified their side to the story.


At the same time, Gautam finds it almost “mystifying” how people directly report a post instead of commenting and starting a discussion. But, this won’t stop him from sharing his ideas and opinions on social media. “My friends and followers have been sharing about this on their timelines. The more you try to curb people, the more they rise over it and raise their voices,” he concludes.

Tags: social media, gautam benegal