Tuesday, Aug 11, 2020 | Last Update : 02:43 PM IST

140th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra52451335842118050 Tamil Nadu3028752446755041 Andhra Pradesh2355251456362116 Karnataka182354991263312 Delhi1461341316574131 Uttar Pradesh126722767212120 West Bengal98459671202059 Bihar8274154139450 Telangana8075157586637 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3433121832109 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland30119738 Arunachal Pradesh223115923 Chandigarh1595100425 Meghalaya11154986 Sikkim9105101 Mizoram6203230
  Opinion   Edit  15 Jul 2020  AA Edit | UGC should put health of the students before marks

AA Edit | UGC should put health of the students before marks

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Jul 15, 2020, 7:40 pm IST
Updated : Jul 15, 2020, 7:40 pm IST

Though the UGC has advised conducting online exam or mixed mode tests, there are massive infrastructural frailties

There are practical aspects of conducting the exam to consider as well, the reason why an eminent institution like IIT Bombay has cancelled it. Representational Image
 There are practical aspects of conducting the exam to consider as well, the reason why an eminent institution like IIT Bombay has cancelled it. Representational Image

The UGC wants final year exams of undergraduate courses completed by September 30. The governments of Punjab, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Delhi have opposed the plan.

Predictably, the Madhya Pradesh government has done an about-face after announcing its decision to cancel them. Once again, instead of looking at what is in the best interests of students, the powers have ended up politicising education.

 

Whose fault is it? Experts feel that the central authority is principally wrong in taking this unilateral decision and in so doing has perpetrated an assault on federalism and on the autonomy of universities. While school education is a state subject, higher education is on the concurrent list.

The decision could easily have been left to the wisdom of individual, state-run, central or autonomous, universities.

There are practical aspects of conducting the exam to consider as well, the reason why an eminent institution like IIT Bombay has cancelled it.

Every university has outstation students, some belonging to villages. Is it safe to call them back to write an exam? What of the supervisors, and support staff? Are village dwellers less equal citizens? If any student — rural- or urban-origin — gets infected by the coronavirus, will the university bear responsibility?

 

Though the UGC has advised conducting online exam or mixed mode tests, there are massive infrastructural frailties.

Servers have been known to crash even in the highbrow Delhi University. A sizeable proportion of the student population also cannot financially afford to appear for an online exam.

Under these exceptional circumstances, therefore, it ill-behoves the commission to bandy about its pet stockphrase of academic credibility. It is advised to focus on students’ mental health instead.

Since the exams would have been over by now in any regular year, many students have enrolled for internships, some are looking for jobs and others are all set to do their masters. The least the UGC can do is not ask them to put their lives on hold.

 

It can come up with an alternative form of evaluation suggestion on its part. For instance, those consistent in their performances will benefit from an average marking based on their previous year's results.

Others can be asked to complete an assignment of their choice and be assessed on its merit. A provisional degree can then be granted, which they can renew within three years.

 

Tags: university grants commission