Wednesday, Oct 21, 2020 | Last Update : 01:52 PM IST

195th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1443409114960338084 Andhra Pradesh7192566588755981 Karnataka6406615157829286 Tamil Nadu6088555529389653 Uttar Pradesh4031013468595864 Delhi2827522506135401 West Bengal2603242287555017 Odisha222734190080912 Kerala204242131048772 Telangana1992761701091163 Bihar178882164537888 Assam169985139977655 Gujarat1332191132403417 Rajasthan1288591077181441 Haryana1237821059901307 Madhya Pradesh117588932382207 Punjab107096840253134 Chhatisgarh9856566860777 Jharkhand7770964515661 Jammu and Kashmir69832495571105 Uttarakhand4533233642555 Goa3107125071386 Puducherry2548919781494 Tripura2412717464262 Himachal Pradesh136799526152 Chandigarh112128677145 Manipur9791760263 Arunachal Pradesh8649623014 Nagaland5768469311 Meghalaya5158334343 Sikkim2707199431 Mizoram178612880
  Opinion   Edit  18 Mar 2017  Gilgit move unacceptable

Gilgit move unacceptable

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Mar 18, 2017, 1:56 am IST
Updated : Mar 18, 2017, 6:40 am IST

The scheme to detach Gilgit-Baltistan from the political geography of J&K is not new.

Gilgit-Baltistan region. (Photo: AFP/File)
 Gilgit-Baltistan region. (Photo: AFP/File)

The move reportedly contemplated by Pakistan to alter the status of Gilgit-Baltistan, an integral part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir under illegal Pakistani occupation since 1947, and declare it as that country’s fifth province, is evidently designed to present India with a fait accompli. Such a unilateral step is retrograde in the context of normalising India-Pakistan relations, and will be a further setback to bilateral relations.

As an Indian spokesman observed Thursday, this project of Islamabad’s violates the 1972 Shimla Agreement and the 1999 Lahore Declaration, wherein India and Pakistan had resolved to settle their differences, including issues relating to Kashmir, bilaterally and without resort to force.

 

The scheme to detach Gilgit-Baltistan from the political geography of J&K is not new. In 1970, Pakistan separated it administratively from PoK. Subsequently, under President Zia-ul Haq, there was a concerted effort to change the demographics of this overwhelmingly Shia area by settling Sunnis from other parts of Pakistan.

Then an artificial demand was whipped up to make Gilgit-Baltistan a new province of Pakistan, obliterating its status as a territory of J&K. That is apparently now reaching the stage of fruition, as the leaked report of a committee headed by Sartaj Aziz, Pakistan’s de facto foreign minister, suggests.

There is speculation that this move may also derive from Chinese pressure to remove uncertainties about the status of Gilgit-Baltistan since much Chinese infrastructure building in Pakistan is in this region and nearby areas. If so, New Delhi will have to sharpen its diplomatic instruments.

 

Tags: gilgit-baltistan, jammu and kashmir