Friday, Aug 14, 2020 | Last Update : 09:04 AM IST

142nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra54831338184318650 Tamil Nadu3145202563135278 Andhra Pradesh2641421709242378 Karnataka1964941126333511 Delhi1494601343184167 Uttar Pradesh140775887862280 West Bengal98459671202059 Telangana8647563074665 Bihar8274154139450 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3811424922127 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland30119738 Arunachal Pradesh223115923 Chandigarh1595100425 Meghalaya11154986 Sikkim9105101 Mizoram6203230
  Opinion   Edit  30 Jan 2020  Liberal, if curious precedent

Liberal, if curious precedent

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Jan 30, 2020, 4:02 am IST
Updated : Jan 30, 2020, 4:02 am IST

The case pertains to the massacre in Ode village in Gujarat’s Anand district on March 1, 2002, in the aftermath of the Godhra tragedy.

Supreme Court of India (Photo: File)
 Supreme Court of India (Photo: File)

Indian law gives courts ample powers to set conditions while granting bail to convicts. The Supreme Court has now used those powers to offer relief to 14 arsonists found guilty of burning to death 23 people after setting their homes on fire. The case pertains to the massacre in Ode village in Gujarat’s Anand district on March 1, 2002, in the aftermath of the Godhra tragedy. One of the conditions imposed on the convicts is that they should do “spiritual and social service” for six hours a week. They need to return to jail only if the apex court also finds them guilty.

The Supreme Court, in its wisdom, would have thought that the new conditions would result in a change in the mindset of the murderers and that they would become reformed individuals once they live the new life the court has scripted for them. We have little knowledge about their motive in killing unarmed people — which included nine women and as many children — in their homes other than communal passion. One can only hope that the court will institute some mechanism to ensure that they attend spiritual service, which would reform them indeed so that they would think twice and stop themselves from being part of another pogrom, even if tempted.

 

Experiments aimed at making hardened criminals humans again must be supported wholeheartedly. However, the apex court, whose decisions become the law of the land and are being followed by the judicial system of the country, should ensure that such experiments are not arbitrary and are followed across the board. Most judicial officers take a tough stand on heinous crimes, especially when they are directed against innocent women and children. The Supreme Court has now set a liberal precedent in such cases. Its repeats should follow a pattern, if it were to be the new norm and bring in the desired results.

Tags: supreme court