Tuesday, Sep 29, 2020 | Last Update : 06:16 PM IST

189th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1351153104994735751 Andhra Pradesh6811616123005745 Tamil Nadu5863975307089383 Karnataka5824584697508641 Uttar Pradesh3908753312705652 Delhi2730982407035272 West Bengal2505802198444837 Odisha212609177585866 Telangana1872111564311107 Kerala179923121264698 Bihar178882164537888 Assam169985139977655 Gujarat1332191132403417 Rajasthan1288591077181441 Haryana1237821059901307 Madhya Pradesh117588932382207 Punjab107096840253134 Chhatisgarh9856566860777 Jharkhand7770964515661 Jammu and Kashmir69832495571105 Uttarakhand4533233642555 Goa3107125071386 Puducherry2548919781494 Tripura2412717464262 Himachal Pradesh136799526152 Chandigarh112128677145 Manipur9791760263 Arunachal Pradesh8649623014 Nagaland5768469311 Meghalaya5158334343 Sikkim2707199431 Mizoram178612880
  Opinion   Edit  27 Aug 2017  Succession woes

Succession woes

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Aug 27, 2017, 12:31 am IST
Updated : Aug 27, 2017, 12:31 am IST

Nilekani’s task is to find a successor to Vishal Sikka who quit following constant criticism on his functioning by Murthy.

Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani
 Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani

It is the case of the known being better than the unknown when it comes to Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani being brought back to handle the succession crisis as the company transits from a promoter driven one to being led by a professional. The crisis at Infosys raises an important issue — whether promoters should have a preferential say in the succession issue. The promoters of Infosys have a total shareholding of little below 13 per cent and this has rightly raised questions, specially among foreign stakeholders, over the undue importance given to Narayana Murthy.  Mr  Nilekani’s task is to find a successor to Vishal Sikka who quit following constant criticism on his functioning by Mr Murthy. But what guarantee is there that the person Mr Nilekani selects will not face the same barrage from Mr Murthy? Mr Sikka, after all, was handpicked by Mr Murthy himself. The other co-founders were also said to be on Mr Murthy’s side. It seems as if promoters have the last say over professionals, a contentious problem that needs to be resolved. The promoters will have to be shown their place. No one would like a co-founder, however haloed, to be sitting like a wolf at the door ready to devour him at the slightest perceived corporate misdemeanour. There are other ways to deal with issues concerning corporate governance. For the present, perhaps much of the problems can be quelled if Mr Nilekani makes public the report that went into the allegations of excesses committed by Mr Sikka and that gave him a clean  chit. It would clear the air. Since Mr Nilekani will be selecting the new board members, it would not be difficult on his part to handle the legitimate demands made by Mr Murthy without hurting the independence of the board.

Tags: nandan nilekani, vishal sikka, narayana murthy