Sunday, Jun 07, 2020 | Last Update : 12:45 PM IST

75th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra8296837390254 Tamil Nadu3017216395254 Delhi2633410315708 Gujarat19119130111190 Rajasthan100847359218 Uttar Pradesh97335648257 Madhya Pradesh89965878384 West Bengal73032912366 Karnataka5213197359 Bihar4598223329 Andhra Pradesh4460264073 Haryana3597120924 Telangana34961710123 Jammu and Kashmir3142104835 Odisha247814819 Punjab2415204347 Assam19894434 Kerala180876216 Uttarakhand115328610 Jharkhand7642975 Chhatisgarh6781892 Tripura6221730 Himachal Pradesh3691636 Chandigarh3022225 Goa126570 Manipur124110 Puducherry90330 Nagaland8000 Arunachal Pradesh3710 Meghalaya33131 Mizoram1710 Sikkim200

To deter lynch mobs, enforce existing laws

Published : Jul 19, 2018, 12:00 am IST
Updated : Jul 18, 2018, 11:18 pm IST

What is needed is the will to execute them so that the message goes out that mob justice won’t be tolerated.

Supreme Court of India (Photo: Asian Age)
 Supreme Court of India (Photo: Asian Age)

The Supreme Court’s anguish about the recurrence of incidents of “mobocracy” in lynching people is understandable. The judges’ well-intentioned advice is worth listening to. The need to stress on lynching as a criminal offence whose consequences will be dire is also timely. Awareness must spread if people aren’t to take the law into their own hands. But the issue boils down to how efficiently the system — the executive, represented by the police, and the judiciary, by judges of all courts, ranging from fast-track courts on heinous crimes to the Supreme Court — which can implement what is written in the statutes. We already have some of the best and most stringent laws to tackle crimes like the lynching. What is needed is the will to execute them so that the message goes out that mob justice won’t be tolerated.

A study of such crimes in the recent past, from 2015 when 200 cases of rough and ready justice meted out by mobs were recorded by Amnesty International, reveals three sections who are most vulnerable — Muslims lynched following rumours of killing cows for the beef trade, dalits attacked by the upper castes for acting “above their stature”, innocent people hounded on the basis of rumours that they are child-lifters and destitute women regarded as witches. In the case of at least one lynching case, a fast-track court handed out death sentences to several people, but they went in appeal to a higher court, which of course is their right, but they are probably betting on the dawdling justice system giving them a very long breather before they face final sentencing. They would then still have the option of clemency appeals on compassionate grounds to the President. The fact that, in the interim, such people are even felicitated by those in power points to the kind of support and encouragement such animal behaviour seems to receive in the present environment.

The dangers of this new trend of assailing those on ideological or any other ground were further emphasised in the manhandling of the renowned environmentalist Swami Agnivesh.

It’s because some seem to get away with such strong-arm tactics that goons are encouraged into thinking these tactics can be reprised. Rising intolerance and polarisation is only one side of the negative inputs triggering such acts as are an affront to the basic civilisational tenets modern societies abide by. A special emphasis on the threat posed to a harmonious society must be laid in the way the executive acts to rein in such elements. If this isn’t done, and mobs are allowed to have their way, then the new normal in law and order can only lead to anarchy. To staunch the threat in time is the challenge the states must live up to, and quickly.

Tags: supreme court, mobocracy