Saturday, Jul 04, 2020 | Last Update : 09:08 PM IST

102nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1929901046878376 Tamil Nadu102721583781385 Delhi94695656242923 Gujarat34686249411905 Uttar Pradesh2579717597749 West Bengal2048813571717 Telangana2046210195283 Karnataka197108807293 Rajasthan1925615352443 Andhra Pradesh176998008218 Haryana1550911019251 Madhya Pradesh1410610815589 Bihar11457848888 Assam9800632814 Jammu and Kashmir76954856105 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Chhatisgarh3065241414 Uttarakhand2791190937 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur13166390 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4593956 Arunachal Pradesh252751 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim101520 Meghalaya50421
  Metros   Mumbai  25 Dec 2016  Bombay High Court refuses to axe PG medical regulation

Bombay High Court refuses to axe PG medical regulation

THE ASIAN AGE. | K A DODHIYA
Published : Dec 25, 2016, 2:23 am IST
Updated : Dec 25, 2016, 5:40 am IST

The high court held that the MCI had framed regulations as it had better knowledge of the issue than the court.

The Bombay High Court (Photo: PTI/File)
 The Bombay High Court (Photo: PTI/File)

Mumbai: The Bombay high court has dismissed a petition seeking the removal of regulation 9 (1) (a) of the Medical Council of India’s postgraduate medical regulations 2000, which disallows any student from continuing postgraduate studies if he suffers from more than 70 per cent disability in the lower body. A clutch of petitions filed by disabled students had challenged the rule on the grounds that modern technology allowed disabled persons to do the same activities as normal people. The high court held that the MCI had framed regulations as it had better knowledge of the issue than the court. The court, however, allowed the students to continue their education as they had invested considerable time in it.  

A division bench of Chief Justice Dr Manjula Chellur and Justice M.S. Sonak was hearing a bunch of writ petitions filed by postgraduate students wherein they had challenged the MCI regulation deeming them ineligible to pursue postgraduate medical education as they had more than 70 per cent disability in their lower body.

 

While praying for removal of the regulation 9 (1) (a) of the postgraduate medical regulations 2000, counsel for the petitioners, advocate Pooja Thorat, said that the rule was discriminatory and the petitioners were being disadvantaged as a result. “Many disabled persons are able to undertake normal activities using prosthetics and hence the MCI rule is unreasonable and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and should be struck down,” prayed Ms Thorat.

However, the bench was of the view that the MCI was the competent authority and had better knowledge about the issue than the court hence it could not strike down the regulation.

Tags: bombay high court, disability, constitution of india, medical council of india
Location: India, Maharashtra, Mumbai (Bombay)