Thursday, Oct 01, 2020 | Last Update : 06:36 PM IST

189th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1351153104994735751 Andhra Pradesh6811616123005745 Tamil Nadu5863975307089383 Karnataka5824584697508641 Uttar Pradesh3908753312705652 Delhi2730982407035272 West Bengal2505802198444837 Odisha212609177585866 Telangana1872111564311107 Kerala179923121264698 Bihar178882164537888 Assam169985139977655 Gujarat1332191132403417 Rajasthan1288591077181441 Haryana1237821059901307 Madhya Pradesh117588932382207 Punjab107096840253134 Chhatisgarh9856566860777 Jharkhand7770964515661 Jammu and Kashmir69832495571105 Uttarakhand4533233642555 Goa3107125071386 Puducherry2548919781494 Tripura2412717464262 Himachal Pradesh136799526152 Chandigarh112128677145 Manipur9791760263 Arunachal Pradesh8649623014 Nagaland5768469311 Meghalaya5158334343 Sikkim2707199431 Mizoram178612880
  Metros   Mumbai  23 Jun 2019  Check if ISIS oath written by accused: HC to forensic

Check if ISIS oath written by accused: HC to forensic

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Jun 23, 2019, 2:46 am IST
Updated : Jun 23, 2019, 2:46 am IST

Siddiqui filed an appeal challenging the trial court order rejecting his bail plea.

Bombay high court
 Bombay high court

Mumbai: The Bombay high court has directed the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, handwriting experts and the central government to ascertain whether or not the oath of allegiance to the ISIS (chief) in Arabic is that of arrested accused Raees Siddiqui.

The HC was hearing an appeal filed by Mr Siddiqui, arrested along with Naser Yafai and three others from Parbhani for planning unlawful activities in Aurangabad. Mr Siddiqui filed an appeal challenging the trial court order rejecting his bail plea.

 

A division bench of Justice Indrajit Mahanty and Justice A.M. Badar was hearing the appeal filed by Mr Siddiqui, challenging the NIA court order rejecting his bail plea. Mr Siddiqui’s lawyers, Mubin Solkar and Abdul Raheem Bukhari, contended before the HC that there was no evidence on record to show involvement of the applicant in the present case.

They argued that the police was suspecting that Mr Siddiqui wrote the chit, which was recovered during the probe. The chit was in Arabic and upon translation, it was found to be an oath of allegiance to the ISIS.

According to the lawyers, the applicant’s name was not there on the chit. They argued that the name mentioned on the chit meant that its author was the father of a girl (name withheld) and that the girl’s name turned out to be that of Mr Siddiqui’s daughter and hence, the ATS was claiming that Mr Siddiqui had written this oath.

 

However, the report of the handwriting expert for this chit was still awaited and it had not been proved that the author of the oath was Mr Siddiqui. Hence, the court directed the director, government examiner of questioned documents, Central Forensic Science Laboratory and other relevant government and police departments to furnish the report of the handwriting expert before the next date of hearing and deferred hearing till July 4, 2019.

Tags: bombay high court, isis