Friday, Jan 28, 2022 | Last Update : 02:44 PM IST

  Metros   Delhi  17 Oct 2018  Man gets life for killing wife

Man gets life for killing wife

Published : Oct 17, 2018, 1:29 am IST
Updated : Oct 17, 2018, 1:29 am IST

. It also imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on Srivastva.

(Representational Image)
 (Representational Image)

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has awarded life imprisonment to a man for murdering his wife in 2010, noting that she died an unnatural death in her matrimonial house.

Additional sessions judge Surinder Kumar Sharma said circumstances strongly indicated that Bihar native Rakesh Kumar Srivastva was responsible for the death of his wife and held him guilty of murder under section 302 (murder) of the IPC. It also imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on Srivastva.


The court agreed with the submission of additional public prosecutor Gaurav Pandey and lawyer Sanjay Kumar Singh that Niharika died an unnatural death and that the postmortem report of the deceased clearly suggested her death took place when the accused was present in the house.

The court said, “The prosecution was able to establish that the death of the woman took place around the time when the accused was supposed to be present in his house; that the relations between the deceased and the accused were not good; that the deceased and the accused were admittedly residing in the same house; the postmortem report suggested the time of death of the deceased was such that the accused was supposed to be present in the house (at the time).”


The court also took into account the subsequent conduct of Srivastva and pointed out that he neither called the neighbours nor did he inform the police of the incident. While noting that the woman died an unnatural death, the court, however, acquitted Srivastva under sections 498-A (husband or relative of husband subjecting wife to cruelty) and 304B (dowry death) of IPC, saying the allegations were vague.

The judge said, “I am of the considered opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove that Niharika was harassed and subjected to cruelty by the accused for or in connection with dowry soon before her death. Therefore, the charge under Section 304B IPC cannot be sustained against the accused.”


The woman had married Srivastva in 2008.

In his complaint, Niharika's father alleged that soon after the marriage, his daughter's in-laws “started taunting Niharika for bringing less dowry”.

Tags: life imprisonment