Saturday, Jul 04, 2020 | Last Update : 06:49 PM IST

102nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1929901046878376 Tamil Nadu102721583781385 Delhi94695656242923 Gujarat34686249411905 Uttar Pradesh2579717597749 West Bengal2048813571717 Telangana2046210195283 Karnataka197108807293 Rajasthan1925615352443 Andhra Pradesh176998008218 Haryana1550911019251 Madhya Pradesh1410610815589 Bihar11457848888 Assam9800632814 Jammu and Kashmir76954856105 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Chhatisgarh3065241414 Uttarakhand2791190937 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur13166390 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4593956 Arunachal Pradesh252751 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim101520 Meghalaya50421
  Metros   Delhi  07 Mar 2020  SC defers hate speech case against Mander till Apr 15

SC defers hate speech case against Mander till Apr 15

THE ASIAN AGE. | PRAMOD KUMAR
Published : Mar 7, 2020, 7:26 am IST
Updated : Mar 7, 2020, 7:26 am IST

The matter is rooted in a plea by Harsh Mander seeking FIRs against BJP leaders Kapil Mishra, Pravesh Singh and Anurag Thakur.

Harsh Mander
 Harsh Mander

New Delhi: The Delhi Police on Friday told the Supreme Court that it has come across another speech of social activist Harsh Mander in which he is disparagingly speaking about judiciary, as court deferred hearing on the content of an earlier speech was deferred till April 15.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Sharad A. Bobde, Justice B.R.Gavai and Justice Surya Kant deferred the hearing till April 15 as senior counsel Dushyant Dave appearing for former bureaucrat turned social activist Harsh Mander told the court that government was trying to browbeat.

 

My right to move the court is seriously harmed. Government wants to “shoot the messenger”. It is “trying to browbeat”, Dave told the court.

Dave told the court that he has gone through December 2019 speech of Mander and there was noting contemptuous in it  or anything that brings down the esteem of the Court.

“It (speech) is not objectionable at all. It does not bring the court in disrepute”, Dave told the court.

As Dave said that he would be the last one to defend someone who has brought disrepute to the institution, Solicitor General Tuishar Mehta said that usually he is the first one to say things …. .

In a retort Dave dared the Solicitor General to bring contempt plea against him.  “If you have courage you bring contempt against me.  Government is trying to browbeat.”

On a poser from the court when Solicitor General Mehta informed the court that police has already filed an affidavit bringing on record the speech delivered by Mander in December 2019, Dave said that he should also bring the same kind of affidavit against those who had indulged in hate speech which led to the death of 53 people.  

The matter is rooted in a plea by Harsh Mander seeking the registration of FIRs against  BJP leaders Kapil Mishra, Pravesh Singh and Anurag Thakur for making inflammatory and hate speeches  since the beginning of this year.

When the court took up the matter early this week, Delhi police informed the court about a speech made by Mander in which he was quoted to have said that they have no faith in the judiciary but they have no choice but to approach it and the eventual fight for justice would be on the streets.

Taking a serious view of the speech, the court said that they would first hear it and said that till then they would not hear the plea by Mander relating to recent communal riots in Delhi.

Tags: delhi police, harsh mander