The most sensational one was the exploitation of women in Haryana’s Sirsa where misdeeds of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh.
New Delhi: The fight for gender justice got a fillip from the judiciary in 2017 as the courts dealt with an iron hand crime and archaic practices against women with the Supreme Court leading from the front by abolishing the system of triple talaq and ‘criminalising’ sex with a minor wife.
The stern message to perpetrators of crime against women was reflected in the apex court’s verdict in the December 16 gangrape-cum-murder case in which all the four convicts were sent to the gallows with strong observations that also mentioned ‘if at all there is a case warranting award of death sentence, it is the present case’.
If the issues relating to triple talaq, physical relation with minor wife and verdict in the December 16, 2012 gangrape and murder case by the top court hogged the limelight, there were other cases and incidents from the courts across the country which dealt with offences against women.
The most sensational one was the exploitation of women in Haryana’s Sirsa where misdeeds of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, the chief of Dera Sacha Sauda, were exposed after a court in Panchkula held him guilty of raping his disciples by sentencing him to 20 years in prison in two cases.
A similar case surfaced in the national capital in which the Delhi high court at the fag end of year swung into action to rescue minor girls and women from the ashrams of another fake spiritual leader Virendra Dev Dixit.
At the same time, women continued their fight for equal right and participation on issues ranging from religion to rituals which were manifested in the hearings of the top court relating to entry of menstruating women devotees in Sabrimala temple and Parsi women wedded outside the community seeking right to participate in ‘Tower of Silence’ and during last rites.
The progressive approach of the top court, as seen in Sabrimala and Parsi matters, was also witnessed while dealing with issues relating to medical termination of pregnancy. However, a controversial verdict annulling marriage of a woman, who had converted before marrying a Muslim man, came from the Kerala high court which dubbed it as ‘love jihad’.
The case finally reached the Supreme Court which allowed the 25-year-old woman, Hadiya, to go to college to pursue her further studies, even as she pleaded to be allowed to go with her husband.
On several occasions, the judges faced ticklish situation when nod for termination of pregnancy was sought on various medical grounds in cases where the foetus was more than 20- week old, a situation which is prohibited under the law.
The SC took a liberal step by taking the opinion of doctors in all such cases, including a case of a mentally retarded rape victim, and allowed termination of pregnancy in most of these matters.
The question of guardians' consent to undergo abortion also cropped up before the court which answered it in negative, holding that fundamental concept of a woman's bodily integrity and personal autonomy has to be respected.
The stand taken by courts in dealing with cases of crime against women is the need of the hour since the data of the National Crime Records Bureau indicates that as compare to 2015, the rape incidents in 2016 have risen sharply in comparison to rise in other crimes, including molestation, cruelty by husband or his relatives.