Monday, Aug 10, 2020 | Last Update : 05:56 AM IST

139th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra51533235171017757 Tamil Nadu2969012386384927 Andhra Pradesh2278601387122036 Karnataka178087939083198 Delhi1454271305874111 Uttar Pradesh122609726502069 West Bengal95554671202059 Bihar7972051315429 Telangana7949555999627 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3433121832109 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland27819048 Arunachal Pradesh215514823 Chandigarh151590425 Meghalaya10624906 Sikkim8664971 Mizoram6082980
  Life   More Features  23 Oct 2019  'Macho' collection culture to disrupt museum collection

'Macho' collection culture to disrupt museum collection

Published : Oct 23, 2019, 11:05 am IST
Updated : Oct 23, 2019, 11:05 am IST

Study suggest that male specimens preferred by animal collectors.

Male birds that are significantly more colourful or ornamental than females – birds of paradise. (Photo: AFP)
 Male birds that are significantly more colourful or ornamental than females – birds of paradise. (Photo: AFP)

Washington: Museum collections of birds and mammals may be disproportionately skewed to favour males, even if female members of the species outnumber males in the wild, according to research published Wednesday.

Natalie Cooper, a researcher in the department of life sciences at the Natural History Museum in London, and her colleagues analysed the sex of almost 2.5 million specimens from five international collections, some dating back over a century.


Although as many as half of the bird specimens were not labelled by sex, of the ones that were, only 40 percent were female. Female mammals represented 48 per cent of the collections identified by sex. "We suspected that some bias towards males would be found because science is done by people, and people have inherent biases towards males," Cooper told AFP.

What surprised the researcher, though, was that there was no change in the ratios from collections dating back 130 years to more recent collections. "In museums, collectors in the 19th century were mostly male, and though this is changing, it's still a male-dominated field," she added.


Collection methods may be part of the problem. In some species, the males may be larger or showier, making them easier to spot and collect. "Hunters are more likely to see and target these individuals," Cooper said.

"So it's important to ensure smaller female individuals are not being overlooked." When scientists disproportionately collect male deer, for example, which are larger than their female counterparts, the specimens studied represent a larger average size than in the wild.

"By ignoring females we don't get a full picture of life," said Cooper. Even when female specimens were larger or showier than males, the study found the median percentage of females was still only 44.6 percent. The same trend applied for male mammals with "ornaments," such as horns, antlers or tusks. But even in species where females also have ornaments, collectors preferred males.


The trend carried over to bird collections, too. Male birds that are significantly more colourful or ornamental than females – birds of paradise, for example – were preferred by collectors, the author said. The males in these species were also more likely to be selected for exhibits.

Tags: museum, birds, culture