Men and women were found to conform to a professional genre when they wrote for an audience with specific expectations.
Washington: Men and women do not communicate much differently from each other, at least when they get the same training and are working on the same type of written
assignment, a new study has found. Researchers at Georgia Institute of Technology in the US looked at nearly 200 legal memos written by first-year law students at two law schools.
All the students were tasked with writing memoranda of law in support of or opposition to a hypothetical motion seeking dismissal of a claim or summary judgement on a claim.
Previous studies on written communication found that women used more "involved" components than men. They tended to use more verbs to describe states of mind,
such as "feel," "realise" or "anticipate."
Other involved language includes contractions, pronouns and dropping the word
"that" from sentences. Men, on the other hand, were more likely to use "informational" features to cram high amounts of information into text. They included more nouns, prepositions and attributive adjectives (such as "plain" language and "legislative" intent).
"I wondered if men and women would abandon the habitual, gendered communication practices other studies have found and conform to a professional genre when they wrote for an audience with specific expectations," said Brian Larson, assistant professor in Georgia Institute of Technology. They writings did not vary significantly when analysed by a computer.
"It would have been impossible for a human reader to find any differences based on gender," Larson said. In the study, both sexes conformed to societal norms when
reaching out to the same audience, writing for the same purpose and attempting to avoid the same negative consequence - a failing grade. "Men and women may communicate differently in some scenarios, especially informal ones like social media.
But this study suggests that if you put them in a professional situation with the same training and ask them to produce similar results, their work will be indistinguishable," said Larson. "People who talk about and assume gender differences will often discuss whether a certain task may be more suited to men than to women," he said. "Destabilising folk beliefs about gender differences serves an important purpose in the legal profession, because we do not want those beliefs to affect the confidence placed
in female attorneys. In other words, we want to prevent gender discrimination in the legal workplace," he added. The study was published in the journal Written Communication.