Friday, Sep 18, 2020 | Last Update : 05:26 PM IST

178th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra114584081235431351 Andhra Pradesh6014625080885177 Tamil Nadu5142084589008618 Karnataka4943563830777629 Uttar Pradesh3362942632884771 Delhi2347011981034877 West Bengal2155801870614183 Odisha167161133466722 Telangana1650031335551005 Bihar164224149722855 Assam150349121610528 Kerala12221687341490 Gujarat119088999083271 Rajasthan109088906851293 Haryana103773816901069 Madhya Pradesh97906743981877 Punjab90032658182646 Chhatisgarh7777541111628 Jharkhand6710052807590 Jammu and Kashmir5971138521951 Uttarakhand3713924810460 Goa2678320844327 Puducherry2142816253431 Tripura2069612956222 Himachal Pradesh11190691997 Chandigarh92566062106 Manipur8430653951 Arunachal Pradesh6851496713 Nagaland5306407910 Meghalaya4356234232 Sikkim2119178923 Mizoram15069490
  India   Lok Sabha rejects Shashi Tharoor’s bill on homosexuality

Lok Sabha rejects Shashi Tharoor’s bill on homosexuality

Published : Mar 12, 2016, 6:36 am IST
Updated : Mar 12, 2016, 6:36 am IST

For a second time in a row, the Lok Sabha voted against the introduction of a private member’s bill brought by Congress MP Shashi Thraoor to decriminalise homosexuality.

Shashi Tharoor
 Shashi Tharoor

For a second time in a row, the Lok Sabha voted against the introduction of a private member’s bill brought by Congress MP Shashi Thraoor to decriminalise homosexuality. The bill was rejected at the introduction stage after the BJP sought division of votes.

Mr Tharoor, who had also brought similar bill in the Winter Session of the Parliament as a private member bill, sought amendment to the “colonial-era” Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code that criminalises homosexuality. The bill in its objective stated that its aim is to “decriminalise sexual intercourse in private between consenting adults, irrespective of their sexuality or gender by restricting the applicability of the section”.


After Mr Tharoor sought the approval of Speaker Sumitra Mahajan, the BJP members demanded division of votes, which was granted. In the vote count, 58 out of 73 members present voted against introduction of the bill, while 14 were in its favour. One member abstained from voting.

Incidentally, the Supreme Court in December 2013 had overturned a verdict of the Delhi high court that had set aside Section 377 of the IPC, while asking the government to take a view on the controversial subject of decriminalising homosexuality. The Delhi high court in 2009 ruled that Section 377 was unconstitutional.

Later, Mr Tharoor accused the BJP of using its “brute majority” in Lok Sabha to thwart his second attempt in three months to introduce a private member’s bill to decriminalise homosexuality. “It was religious bigotry of the ruling party that had disallowed discussion on his private bill to amend the colonial-era Section 377 of the IPC which criminalises homosexuality. The Parliament is a place for open deliberations on all issues,” said Mr Tharoor.


The Congress MP, however, made a good use of the opportunity to speak on another private member bill on the “Rights of Transgender Persons”, which was brought by BJD MP B.J. Panda. Speaking on this bill, Mr Tharoor said: “The House is not allowed to deliberate on a law which was framed by the British rulers on the principles of Victorian morality. Even President Pranab Mukherjee previously had advocated rewriting of the IPC substantively.”

The BJD MP Bhartruhari Mahtab argued that the government should legislate on measures to safeguard the interests of transgenders.

Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi