Sunday, Aug 09, 2020 | Last Update : 08:13 PM IST

138th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra49026232728117092 Tamil Nadu2850242275754690 Andhra Pradesh2170401296151939 Karnataka164924842322998 Delhi1441271293624098 Uttar Pradesh118038698332028 West Bengal89666630601954 Telangana7751354330615 Bihar7578648673419 Gujarat68855517922604 Assam5549737225132 Rajasthan5065636310776 Odisha4419328698307 Haryana4005433444467 Madhya Pradesh3729827621962 Kerala3312020862107 Jammu and Kashmir2439020862459 Punjab2193014040539 Jharkhand165427503154 Chhatisgarh11408831987 Uttarakhand89015731112 Goa7947559570 Tripura6014408437 Puducherry5123291475 Manipur3635192711 Himachal Pradesh3242201513 Nagaland26888937 Arunachal Pradesh204913263 Chandigarh137482023 Meghalaya10234236 Sikkim8544061 Mizoram5672890
  India   Govt and temporary staff must get equal pay, says Supreme Court

Govt and temporary staff must get equal pay, says Supreme Court

Published : Nov 3, 2016, 12:54 am IST
Updated : Nov 3, 2016, 12:54 am IST

If duties and responsibilities of temporary employees working in the government as pump operators, fitters, helpers, drivers, plumbers, chowkidars were the same as that of government employees, such w

If duties and responsibilities of temporary employees working in the government as pump operators, fitters, helpers, drivers, plumbers, chowkidars were the same as that of government employees, such wage earners were entitled to scales of pay on par with government employees on the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, the Supreme Court has held.

A bench of Justices J. S. Khehar and S.A. Bode said the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ was deducible from the Preamble and Articles 14, 16 and 39(d) of the Constitution. The principle applies to cases of unequal scales of pay, based on no classification or irrational classification, though both sets of employees (temporary and regular) performed identical duties.

 

The bench said all the temporary employees in the Punjab government mentioned in the appeals were appointed against posts that were also available in the regular cadre/establishment. It pointed out that during the course of their employment, the temporary employees were being randomly deputed to discharge duties and responsibilities which at some point in time were assigned to regular employees.

Likewise, regular employees holding substantive posts were also posted to discharge the work assigned to temporary employees from time to time. The bench said there was, therefore, no room for any doubt that the duties and responsibilities discharged by the temporary employees in the present set of appeals were the same as were being discharged by regular employees. The court said that the fact that the temporary employees did not possess the qualifications prescribed for appointment on regular basis or that the the temporary employees would not be entitled to pay parity does not make a case for the government.

 

It held that temporary employees would be entitled to draw wages at the minimum of the pay-scale extended to regular employees holding the same post.

Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi