Friday, Jan 28, 2022 | Last Update : 03:15 AM IST

  India   All India  24 Jan 2019  SC refuses to stay amendments to SC/ST Act

SC refuses to stay amendments to SC/ST Act

PTI
Published : Jan 24, 2019, 2:51 pm IST
Updated : Jan 24, 2019, 2:51 pm IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to stay the amendments to the SC/ST.

The bench referred the matter to the Chief Justice for reconstitution of a bench. (File Photo)
 The bench referred the matter to the Chief Justice for reconstitution of a bench. (File Photo)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to stay the amendments to the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that restored the provision of no anticipatory bail for the accused.

A bench headed by Justice A K Sikri said the pending review petition filed by the Centre against the apex court's March 20, 2018 verdict and the pleas challenging the new amendments made in the SC/ST verdict will be taken up together.

 

The bench referred the matter to the Chief Justice for reconstitution of a bench which Justice U U Lalit was a part of. Justice Lalit was part of a bench which had passed the March verdict, taking note of the rampant misuse of the stringent SC/ST Act against government servants and held that there would be no immediate arrest on any complaint filed under the law.

The top court had earlier said that the new amendments to the SC/ST law passed by Parliament cannot be stayed and had sought the Centre's response on pleas challenging the provisions.

The pleas have sought declaration of the new amendments to the Schedule Castes and Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act as ultra vires. Parliament on August 9 last year had passed the bill to overturn the apex court order concerning certain safeguards against arrest under the SC and ST law.

 

The amendments rule out any provision for anticipatory bail for a person accused of atrocities against SC/STs, notwithstanding any court order. They provide that no preliminary inquiry will be required for registering a criminal case and an arrest under this law would not be subject to any approval.

The court was hearing the pleas alleging that the two Houses of Parliament had "arbitrarily" decided to amend the law and restored the previous provisions in such a manner so that an innocent cannot avail the right of anticipatory bail.

Tags: supreme court, sc, st
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi