Wednesday, Jul 15, 2020 | Last Update : 10:57 PM IST

113th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra27564015261310928 Tamil Nadu1518201023102167 Delhi115346932363446 Karnataka4407717391846 Gujarat43723305552070 Uttar Pradesh3972424981983 Telangana3774524840375 Andhra Pradesh3545118378452 West Bengal34427206801000 Rajasthan2557119169524 Haryana2262817090312 Madhya Pradesh1900513575673 Bihar1885313019143 Assam178081217451 Odisha14280986496 Jammu and Kashmir111736223195 Kerala8931443835 Punjab85115663213 Chhatisgarh4379327520 Jharkhand4225242836 Uttarakhand3686286750 Goa2753160718 Tripura218315382 Manipur167210200 Puducherry153182918 Himachal Pradesh130993810 Nagaland8963460 Chandigarh60044610 Arunachal Pradesh3871453 Meghalaya318462 Mizoram2381590 Sikkim211860
  India   All India  22 Jan 2020  Why did Rajini rake it up again?

Why did Rajini rake it up again?

Published : Jan 22, 2020, 6:41 am IST
Updated : Jan 22, 2020, 6:41 am IST

For the Tamil people know more about Thuglak, Murasoli and Periyar than him, which Rajini should be aware of.


Chennai: What did actor Rajinikanth  gain by stepping out of his house to tell the media that he would not take back his words, uttered at the golden jubilee celebration of Thuglak magazine on January 14? His digging in his heels is only as intriguing as to why he said those (now controversial) words on Periyar and also the Murasoli newspaper in the first place, seven days earlier.

If one were to ask what else should he be expected to speak at a Thuglak event, the answer is: Yes, you may have a point. But Rajinikant need not have used that platform to denigrate what he might otherwise abhor, the DMK and Periyar, just to present a rosy picture of Thuglak to the people of Tamil Nadu. For the Tamil people know more about Thuglak, Murasoli and Periyar than him, which Rajini should be aware of.

Yet if he did that the only reason could be that he has been sucked into the whirl of the modern day political discourse, in which it is sought to be expounded that the state has to discard its history, present ideologies and leanings and start afresh with new faces. To put it more succinctly, the fashionable belief is that the state has gone to the dogs because of the Dravidian movement and it has to be redeemed from further decline by subscribing to alternative ideologies and political beliefs and picking new leaders. So, Rajinikanth, who has not hidden his political ambitions of late, feels that he can fill in the gap. But to clear the ground for him he may to do away with the lingering legacy of Periyar and the Dravidian movement.

But as someone who is not well versed in Tamil Nadu history and politics, he takes inputs from others and naturally slips up on some facts like the alleged nude pictures of Ram and Sita.

Yet one cannot blame him for the faux pas at all. In 1971 he was not in Tamil Nadu — his first film came out only in 1975 — and he might not have read Murasoli even once.

But he now knows that by clubbing Murasoli and Periyar together and indirectly urging the people to dump them alone can pave the way for his political ingress in Tamil Nadu.

Tags: thuglak magazine, rajinikanth