Thursday, Jul 02, 2020 | Last Update : 03:32 PM IST

100th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra180298931548053 Tamil Nadu94049529261264 Delhi89802599922803 Gujarat33318240381869 Uttar Pradesh2405616629718 West Bengal1917012528683 Rajasthan1831214574421 Telangana173578082267 Karnataka165148065253 Andhra Pradesh152526988193 Haryana1494110499240 Madhya Pradesh1386110655581 Bihar10204781173 Assam8956583212 Jammu and Kashmir76954856105 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Uttarakhand2791190937 Chhatisgarh2339193713 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur12605790 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4463676 Arunachal Pradesh182601 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim88490 Meghalaya50421
  India   All India  19 Dec 2019  Supreme Court rejects plea of accused in Nirbhaya case

Supreme Court rejects plea of accused in Nirbhaya case

THE ASIAN AGE. | PARMOD KUMAR
Published : Dec 19, 2019, 3:33 am IST
Updated : Dec 19, 2019, 3:33 am IST

The court gave Akshay Kumar Singh seven days’ time, as permitted, to file mercy petition before the President.

Nirbhaya’s mother after  a hearing at the Supreme Court in New Delhi on Wednesday. (Photo: PTI)
 Nirbhaya’s mother after a hearing at the Supreme Court in New Delhi on Wednesday. (Photo: PTI)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a plea by Akshay Kumar Singh, an accused in the December 2012 Delhi gang rape case and murder case, to reconsider its 2017 verdict upholding the death sentence awarded to him and three others.

Rejecting the plea seeking a review of its May 5, 2017, judgment, a bench of Justice R. Banumathi, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice A.S. Bopanna said that no new ground have been raised by the petitioner for reconsideration.

 

Pronouncing the judgment, Justice Banumathi said that all the contentions in the petition are what was argued before the court in the course of the hearing of the appeals by the four convicts against the high court judgment and were also raised by the other three accused — Mukesh, Pawan, Vinay Sharma — in their plea for reconsideration of death sentence.

The court gave Akshay Kumar Singh seven days’ time, as permitted, to file mercy petition before the President. Lawyer A.P. Singh, appearing for Akshay Kumar, had sought three weeks’ time to file mercy petition, but solicitor general Tushar Mehta told the court that permissible time for filing mercy petition was seven days.  

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Delhi government, told the court that there are some crimes for which the “humanity cries” and Nirbhaya case was one of them.

“There are some crimes for which the humanity cries. On that fateful day, God also must have held his head in shame for two reasons. First for not being able to save the innocent girl and second for having created these five monsters,” Mr Mehta said.

God must have held his head in shame on December 12, 2012, for not being able to save the “innocent” victim and for creating these “five monsters”, he added while seeking dismissal of Akshay Singh’s review plea.

On July 9 last year, the court had rejected review petitions of Mukesh, Pawan and Vinay Sharma.

A top court bench comprising Justice Dipak Misra, Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Ashok Bhushan by their May 5, 2017, judgment had upheld the death sentence awarded to Mukesh, Pawan, Vinay Sharma, Akshay Singh by the trial court and reaffirmed by Delhi high court.

Rejecting the plea, the court had said petitions seeking reconsideration of the May 5, 2017, verdict must show an error resulting in miscarriage of justice.

“In these review petitions no ground has been made out which may furnish any  ground to review the judgment. We, thus, find no merit in these review petitions and consequently, the review petitions are dismissed”, said the July 9, 2018, judgment.

The four accused — Mukesh, Pawan, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Kumar Singh — were convicted on charges of raping and assaulting a 23-year-old paramedical student inside a bus that led to her death and triggered nationwide protests.

Fifth accused committed suicide in prison while the sixth, a juvenile, has been released after serving his probation period in a remand home.

Tags: supreme court, nirbhaya case