Tuesday, Oct 20, 2020 | Last Update : 05:43 AM IST

195th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1443409114960338084 Andhra Pradesh7192566588755981 Karnataka6406615157829286 Tamil Nadu6088555529389653 Uttar Pradesh4031013468595864 Delhi2827522506135401 West Bengal2603242287555017 Odisha222734190080912 Kerala204242131048772 Telangana1992761701091163 Bihar178882164537888 Assam169985139977655 Gujarat1332191132403417 Rajasthan1288591077181441 Haryana1237821059901307 Madhya Pradesh117588932382207 Punjab107096840253134 Chhatisgarh9856566860777 Jharkhand7770964515661 Jammu and Kashmir69832495571105 Uttarakhand4533233642555 Goa3107125071386 Puducherry2548919781494 Tripura2412717464262 Himachal Pradesh136799526152 Chandigarh112128677145 Manipur9791760263 Arunachal Pradesh8649623014 Nagaland5768469311 Meghalaya5158334343 Sikkim2707199431 Mizoram178612880
  India   All India  12 Jun 2020  Delhi high court won't entertain pleas on imposition of lockdown in Delhi

Delhi high court won't entertain pleas on imposition of lockdown in Delhi

PTI
Published : Jun 12, 2020, 2:53 pm IST
Updated : Jun 12, 2020, 2:53 pm IST

Subsequently, the petitioners withdrew their pleas.

Representational image.
 Representational image.

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court Friday declined to entertain two PILs seeking direction to the AAP government to consider imposing lockdown in the national capital in view of the spike in COVID-19 cases.

A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan heard the matter and said it was not going to issue any notice and subsequently, the petitioners withdrew their pleas.

 

One of the petitions was moved by a lawyer, Anirban Mondal, who wanted the Delhi government to consider imposing lockdown in view of rising COVID-19 cases in the city.

Advocate Mridul Chakravarty, appearing for Mondal, said he submitted before the bench that the Madras High Court has asked the Tamil Nadu government as to why the lockdown cannot be imposed again and on Thursday another bench of Delhi High Court had observed that the city was heading towards becoming the "corona capital" in view of spike in COVID-19 cases.

He said he also submitted before the court that lockdown for a limited period would provide the Delhi government with breathing space, break the transmission cycle and ramp up the facilities.

 

Delhi government additional standing counsel Gautam Narayan, who appeared for health department in Mondal's matter, said the court declined to issue notice in the matter.

However, the reasons for not entertaining the two PILs might be indicated in the court's order which is not yet available.

The other petition was by another advocate, Ankit Verma, who also wanted lockdown in Delhi and sealing of its borders in view of spike in COVID-19 cases. The bench declined to issue notice in that matter as well, Delhi government additional standing counsel Anuj Aggarwal, who appeared for health department in the second case, said.

Mondal said in his plea that the Delhi government itself admitted there would be around one lakh COVID-19 cases in the national capital by end of June and the number would escalate to around 2.25 lakh by mid-July and over 5.5 lakh by July end. In such a scenario, the government should consider imposing strict lockdown in Delhi, he said.

 

Tags: the delhi high court, coronavirus in delhi, coronavirus cases in india, coronavirus treatment
Location: India, Delhi, Delhi