Tuesday, Oct 20, 2020 | Last Update : 11:08 PM IST

195th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1443409114960338084 Andhra Pradesh7192566588755981 Karnataka6406615157829286 Tamil Nadu6088555529389653 Uttar Pradesh4031013468595864 Delhi2827522506135401 West Bengal2603242287555017 Odisha222734190080912 Kerala204242131048772 Telangana1992761701091163 Bihar178882164537888 Assam169985139977655 Gujarat1332191132403417 Rajasthan1288591077181441 Haryana1237821059901307 Madhya Pradesh117588932382207 Punjab107096840253134 Chhatisgarh9856566860777 Jharkhand7770964515661 Jammu and Kashmir69832495571105 Uttarakhand4533233642555 Goa3107125071386 Puducherry2548919781494 Tripura2412717464262 Himachal Pradesh136799526152 Chandigarh112128677145 Manipur9791760263 Arunachal Pradesh8649623014 Nagaland5768469311 Meghalaya5158334343 Sikkim2707199431 Mizoram178612880
  India   All India  09 Jan 2018  Allow freedom of press, Supreme Court tells political leaders

Allow freedom of press, Supreme Court tells political leaders

THE ASIAN AGE. | J. VENKATESAN
Published : Jan 9, 2018, 1:16 am IST
Updated : Jan 9, 2018, 1:16 am IST

The high court, however, rejected the complaint and the present appeal is directed against this order.

Supreme Court of India (Photo: Asian Age)
 Supreme Court of India (Photo: Asian Age)

New Delhi: Against the backdrop of UIADI lodging a police case against an English newspaper for its expose on how unsafe Aadhaar data is, the Supreme Court on Monday asked politicians to allow journalists freedom of expression even if there is some “wrong reporting.”

Dismissing an appeal filed by Rahmat Fatima Amanullah, a former Bihar MLA, against a Patna high court order, a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.M. Kanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud told the counsel, “You must allow freedom of expression by journalists. There may be some wrong reporting.  But don’t hold on to it forever.”

 

The Patna high court had in September last year quashed defamation cases against the journalists of a Hindi Channel (IBN-7). It was alleged by the petitioner that to increase its TRPs, the television channel had run a story without verifying facts.

The complainant, who claimed to be the daughter of a senior and reputed bureaucrat, and that her mother was a minister in the Bihar government, alleged that on July 18, 2011, IBN-7 channel aired a news report regarding a scam in the allotment of BIADA land. She alleged that in the report the TV channel uttered some scandalous and defamatory remarks against her and her parents. The petitioner alleged that the channel did not exercise care,  caution and honesty in its reporting, but defamed and harmed the reputation of her respectable family with the sole objective of increasing its TRPs and, thereby, revenue.

 

The high court, however, rejected the complaint and the present appeal is directed against this order.

Tags: uiadi, supreme court, aadhaar data