Thursday, Jul 02, 2020 | Last Update : 03:42 PM IST

100th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra180298931548053 Tamil Nadu94049529261264 Delhi89802599922803 Gujarat33318240381869 Uttar Pradesh2405616629718 West Bengal1917012528683 Rajasthan1831214574421 Telangana173578082267 Karnataka165148065253 Andhra Pradesh152526988193 Haryana1494110499240 Madhya Pradesh1386110655581 Bihar10204781173 Assam8956583212 Jammu and Kashmir76954856105 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Uttarakhand2791190937 Chhatisgarh2339193713 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur12605790 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4463676 Arunachal Pradesh182601 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim88490 Meghalaya50421
  India   All India  08 Jan 2020  SC: Look into plea on RBI exchange of currency notes

SC: Look into plea on RBI exchange of currency notes

THE ASIAN AGE. | PRAMOD KUMAR
Published : Jan 8, 2020, 1:51 am IST
Updated : Jan 8, 2020, 1:51 am IST

Mehta said that he would first like to look into the allegations made by the PIL petitioner.

Supreme Court of India
 Supreme Court of India

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the solicitor-general to look into a public interest suit seeking court-monitored probe into the alleged RBI exchange of currency notes worth Rs 30 crores that were defaced by a separatist group in J&K by stamping them with their slogan in August 2013.

A bench headed by the Chief Justice S.A. Bobde asked solicitor-general Tushar Mehta to take instructions from the government on the plea raised by the PIL petitioner Satish Bhardwaj, who told the court that he had sought information through RTI from the RBI and the CBI in 2013 itself but did not get any response or the reply was vague. He said the currency notes were exchanged at the Jammu branch of the RBI.

 

Directing the listing of the matter after two weeks, CJI Bobde directed the court registry to furnish a copy of the petition upon solicitor general Mehta appearing for the Centre.

“This is a matter of national interest,” CJI Bobde told Mr Mehta, making a distinction between the PIL before it and the cases being heard by a bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana.

As court asked if it sh-ould issue formal notice in the PIL before it, Mr Mehta said that he would first like to look into the allegations made by the PIL petitioner.

Tags: supreme court, s.a. bobde