Sunday, Feb 28, 2021 | Last Update : 12:31 PM IST

  India   All India  07 May 2019  Sacked BSF jawan moves SC, seeks to contest poll

Sacked BSF jawan moves SC, seeks to contest poll

THE ASIAN AGE. | J VENKATESAN
Published : May 7, 2019, 2:04 am IST
Updated : May 7, 2019, 2:31 am IST

In view of the abject failure of the Election Commission in exercising its constitutional power to ensure free and fair election.

sacked BSF jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav (Photo: Facebook)
 sacked BSF jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav (Photo: Facebook)

New Delhi: The sacked BSF jawan Tej Bahadur moved the Supreme Court on Monday challenging the rejection of his nomination papers by the returning officer of Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency from where the Prime Minister  

In a writ petition Mr Bahadur urged the court to set aside the order passed by the returning officer on May 1 and to allow him to contest the polls scheduled for May 19. He submitted that he filed his nomination papers on April 29 and he was asked to produce a certificate that he had not been dismissed from service either for corruption or disloyalty to the nation.

 

As he could not submit the certificate the next day, the returning officer rejected the nomination on the ground that he was dismissed from the government service on April 19, 2017 and five years period from the date of such dismissal has not elapsed, in terms of section 9 of the Represen-tation of the People Act.

The Returning Officer while passing the impugned order dated on May 5 also observed that “the nomination paper is neither accompanied by certificate issued in the prescribed manner by the Election Commission (EC) to the effect that he has not been dismissed for corruption or disloyalty to the state”.

The petitioner said he had submitted a reply to the notice dated stating that he was dismissed on 19.04.2017 due to indiscipline, which is not covered under section 9 of the R.P. Act and therefore, certificate by the EC under Section 33 (3) of the Act of 1951 was not required.

 

Rejection of nomination under Section 36 of the Act of 1951 is not only err-oneous, arbitrary and ma-lafide but also showed the failure of the EC in not invoking the constitutional powers under Article 324 of the Constitution to remedy the present situation, for ensuring free and fair election, he argued.

In view of the abject failure of the Election Commission in exercising its constitutional power to ensure free and fair election and also total arbitrariness and malafide of the Returning Officer in disqualifying the Petitioner from contesting the Lok Sabha election, he has been constrained to approach this Court for relief, the petition said.

 

Tags: tej bahadur yadav, supreme court
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi