Saturday, Jul 04, 2020 | Last Update : 05:33 PM IST

102nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1929901046878376 Tamil Nadu102721583781385 Delhi92175630072864 Gujarat34686249411905 Uttar Pradesh2579717597749 West Bengal2048813571717 Telangana2046210195283 Karnataka197108807293 Rajasthan1925615352443 Andhra Pradesh176998008218 Haryana1550911019251 Madhya Pradesh1410610815589 Bihar10911821184 Assam8956583212 Jammu and Kashmir76954856105 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Uttarakhand2791190937 Chhatisgarh2339193713 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur13166390 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4463676 Arunachal Pradesh182601 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim101520 Meghalaya50421
  India   All India  05 Apr 2019  Petition for urgent listing of case nixed

Petition for urgent listing of case nixed

THE ASIAN AGE. | J. VENKATESAN
Published : Apr 5, 2019, 1:24 am IST
Updated : Apr 5, 2019, 1:24 am IST

The petitioner submitted that the high court had rejected the plea without taking into consideration several factors.

The Supreme Court (Photo: PTI/File)
 The Supreme Court (Photo: PTI/File)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to consider the plea of Christuva Nallenna Iyakkam, Chennai, for urgent listing of its appeal, seeking postponement of the Lok Sabha polls in Tamil Nadu from April 18 to any other date. The petition is likely to be listed for hearing on April 8.  

When counsel for the petitioner made a ‘mention’ for urgent listing, Justice S.A. Bobde, heading, a bench asked the counsel, “Can’t you cast your vote on a holy day? How long does it take to vote? We don’t want to advise you how to pray and how to cast your vote. There is no urgency.”

 

The petitioner’s counsel told the court that the Madras high court had dismissed their plea on March 22 and the special leave petition is directed against this order.

The petitioner submitted that the high court had rejected the plea without taking into consideration several factors. It ought to have harmonised the two aspects of the present case; firstly, the fundamental right of the Christians to do religious practice on the holy triduum which begins with Maundy Thursday followed by Good Friday and Holy Easter on Sunday.

Secondly, high court ought to have enabled them to discharge their fundamental duty to cast the vote in a free manner without any hindrance to their religious practices.

Tags: supreme court, lok sabha polls, good friday