Tuesday, Jun 25, 2024 | Last Update : 04:18 AM IST

  India   All India  03 Jul 2017  SpiceJet to deposit Rs 579 cr in row with Maran: Delhi HC

SpiceJet to deposit Rs 579 cr in row with Maran: Delhi HC

Published : Jul 3, 2017, 6:30 pm IST
Updated : Jul 3, 2017, 7:22 pm IST

Reacting to the verdict of the high court, SpiceJet officials said that there will be no dilution of stake to Marans.

Representational Image. (Photo: File)
 Representational Image. (Photo: File)

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Monday directed budget carrier SpiceJet to deposit Rs 579 crore in connection with a share transfer dispute with its previous owner Kalanithi Maran, but provided it some relief by allowing it to deposit the amount in two parts.

A bench of Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna said it was "essential" to modify the single judge order, which had directed that the entire amount be deposited in 12 months, due to the "unpredictable nature of likely injury that may be caused to the commercial operations of the company if entire amount is secured through a deposit".

The court said that part of the amount can be deposited by way of a bank guarantee and the remaining by cash and dismissed the plea of the airline and its co-founder Ajay Singh against the single judge's July last year order.

The bench had initially said that Rs 250 crore in cash and Rs 229 crore as bank guarantee should be deposited, which was Rs 100 crore short of the total amount of Rs 579 crore.

The lawyers in the case pointed out the error in the calculation to the court staff after the bench had risen.

Thereafter, when the judges came back after a few minutes the lawyers mentioned the same to them and the bench said it will "take care of it".

Reacting to the verdict of the high court, SpiceJet officials said on condition of anonymity that there will be no dilution of stake to Marans.

They said the order "gets rid of the warrants issue and will help the company focus on the long term strategy and conduct its business normally without any constraints".

The officials also claimed the company has the ability to generate these funds and added that a final decision will be taken by the arbitrator.

SpiceJet and Singh had challenged the single judge's July last year's interim order saying the court did not have the jurisdiction.

The single judge's order had come on a civil suit by Sun Group chief Kalanithi Maran and his Kal Airways.

In their suit, Maran and his airline company had sought issuance of stock warrants in SpiceJet to them as per a sale purchase agreement (SPA) of 2015 which had led to the transfer of ownership of the budget carrier to Ajay Singh.

Maran and Kal Airways had alleged before the single judge that despite giving Rs 579 crore to SpiceJet, the carrier had failed to issue them the warrants or allot tranche one and two of Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares and that the amount was not utilised for paying statutory dues due to which they were also facing prosecution.

Apart from ordering that the amount be deposited in the court, the single judge had also asked Spicejet and Maran to appoint an arbitral tribunal to decide the share transfer dispute between them in a year.

The amount was to be deposited in five instalments with the first one in August 2016, the court had said.

Market regulator SEBI had earlier expressed its inability before the single judge to approve the board resolution passed by SpiceJet for issue of warrants in favour of Maran and his Kal Airways. The board resolution was passed on the court's direction.

Under the SPA, Maran and Kal Airways had transferred their entire 350,428,758 equity shares (58.46 per cent stake) in the airline to Ajay Singh.

According to the SPA, Maran and Kal were to receive the redeemable warrants in return for the amount they were to give to the airline towards operating costs and debt payment, Maran had said in his plea.

SpiceJet had earlier told the court that the change of ownership was effected as a rehabilitative measure to address the liability of Rs 2,000 crore incurred by the airline when it was under the management of Maran.

It had also claimed that every penny had been utilised towards operations and discharge of liabilities.

Tags: delhi high court, spicejet, sale purchase agreement, share transfer dispute
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi