Wednesday, Aug 05, 2020 | Last Update : 10:37 PM IST

133rd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra45795629935616142 Tamil Nadu2682852087844349 Andhra Pradesh176333956251604 Karnataka145830692722704 Delhi1391561252264033 Uttar Pradesh100310572711817 West Bengal80984568841785 Telangana6894649675563 Gujarat65704485612529 Bihar6203140760349 Assam4816233429115 Rajasthan4667932832732 Haryana3779631226448 Odisha3768124483258 Madhya Pradesh3508225414912 Kerala279561629988 Jammu and Kashmir2239614856417 Punjab1901512491462 Jharkhand140705199129 Chhatisgarh10109761369 Uttarakhand8008484795 Goa7075511460 Tripura5520367528 Puducherry4147253758 Manipur301818147 Himachal Pradesh2879171013 Nagaland24056594 Arunachal Pradesh179011053 Chandigarh120671520 Meghalaya9173305 Sikkim7832971 Mizoram5022820
  Relief to CM Arvind Kejriwal, SC stays summons by UP court

Relief to CM Arvind Kejriwal, SC stays summons by UP court

Published : Oct 28, 2016, 2:02 am IST
Updated : Oct 28, 2016, 2:02 am IST

In a major relief to chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and AAP leader Kumar Vishwas, the Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the summons issued against them by a court in Uttar Pradesh and issued notice to

In a major relief to chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and AAP leader Kumar Vishwas, the Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the summons issued against them by a court in Uttar Pradesh and issued notice to the state government seeking its response.

A bench of Justices J.S. Khehar and Arun Mishra stayed the summons issued by the Sultanpur court to Mr Kejriwal and Mr Vishwas, who have been accused of violating prohibitory orders by holding an unscheduled roadside meeting while going to Amethi and thereby obstructing the movement of traffic. The present appeal was directed against an order of the Allahabad HC declining to stay the summons.

 

According to the appellants during the last Lok Sabha elections, an FIR was lodged against them by the assistant election officer on April 20, 2014, under IPC sections including 143 (punishment for unlawful assembly), 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 341 (wrongful restraint), 353, 171G (false statement in connection with an election). It was alleged that the petitioners had not acquired proper permissions and caused inconvenience and traffic jams due to procession. The party workers also allegedly violated the code of conduct and used criminal force against public servants on duty. It was submitted on their behalf that they had requisite permissions for a rally and there was no prohibitory order in force at the time of alleged offence. They had also told the court that the local administration and police had filed frivolous complaints against them to cause impediments in their election campaign in Gauriganj area of Amethi district.

 

Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi