The Jawaharlal Nehru University, which received maximum number of sexual harassment complaints by any educational institution in Delhi in the last two years, has notified a revamped sexual harassment
The Jawaharlal Nehru University, which received maximum number of sexual harassment complaints by any educational institution in Delhi in the last two years, has notified a revamped sexual harassment policy that also includes penalty provisions for false complaints.
According to a Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) report, 101 cases of sexual harassment were reported from various universities in Delhi, barring the Delhi University, since 2013. Of these, about 50 per cent were reported in JNU. The DU had not submitted the list of such cases.
JNU has Gender Sensitisation Committee Against Sexual Harassment (GSCASH), a central body which deals with complaints of this nature from across the university departments.
The panel had submitted a draft of the revised rules and procedures in accordance with the 2013 guidelines of the Supreme Court to vice-chancellor S.K. Sopory in September this year which has been approved by the varsity’s executive council.
One of the major amendments in the policy is introduction of a provision for protection from victimisation of the complainant as well as witnesses besides a penalty provision for false complaints.
The revamped policy also has different clauses for “sexual harassment at workplace” and “sexual harassment in academic spheres” and for re-appealing if the complainant is dissatisfied with GSCASH’s decision.
According to the notified policy, “If the committee finds that a complaint registered by a person is false, he or she will be served a showcause notice to detail the reasons behind doing so.” “In the event of no, insufficient, or unconvincing explanation, GSCASH shall forward its findings to the appropriate university authority for further action which might include a restraint order, change in hostel or a disciplinary action,” it says.
The university will also ensure that the defendant does not evaluate the examination or supervise the research of the complainant and vice versa to ensure there is no victimisation.
