Thursday, Jul 16, 2020 | Last Update : 12:38 AM IST

113th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra27564015261310928 Tamil Nadu1518201023102167 Delhi115346932363446 Karnataka4407717391846 Gujarat43723305552070 Uttar Pradesh3972424981983 Telangana3774524840375 Andhra Pradesh3545118378452 West Bengal34427206801000 Rajasthan2557119169524 Haryana2262817090312 Madhya Pradesh1900513575673 Bihar1885313019143 Assam178081217451 Odisha14280986496 Jammu and Kashmir111736223195 Kerala8931443835 Punjab85115663213 Chhatisgarh4379327520 Jharkhand4225242836 Uttarakhand3686286750 Goa2753160718 Tripura218315382 Manipur167210200 Puducherry153182918 Himachal Pradesh130993810 Nagaland8963460 Chandigarh60044610 Arunachal Pradesh3871453 Meghalaya318462 Mizoram2381590 Sikkim211860
  Business   In Other News  17 Jan 2020  Telcos get no relief from Supreme Court

Telcos get no relief from Supreme Court

THE ASIAN AGE. | PRAMOD KUMAR
Published : Jan 17, 2020, 2:34 am IST
Updated : Jan 17, 2020, 2:34 am IST

Bharti Airtel said it was disappointed with the Supreme Court’s decision and it would evaluate filing another petition.

Supreme Court of India (Photo: File)
 Supreme Court of India (Photo: File)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a plea by the telecom service providers (TSPs) for a reconsideration of the court’s 2019 verdict that directed them to pay Rs 92.000 crore of past dues over sharing of adjusted gross revenue (AGR).

The TSPs that had sought a reconsideration of the order included Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea and many now defunct telecom companies.

Dismissing the TSPs’ plea, a bench of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice M.R.Shah said, “Having perused the review petitions and the connected papers with meticulous care, we do not find any justifiable reason to entertain the review petitions. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.”

With this, the court also rejected the plea for an open court hearing of the review petitions.

Bharti Airtel said it was disappointed with the Supreme Court’s decision and it would evaluate filing another petition.

“The industry continues to face severe financial stress and the outcome could further erode the viability of the sector as a whole,” Bharti said in a statement.

The internet service providers (ISPs) supported the TSPs and exhorted the government to step in immediately to review the definition AGR for the survival of the telecom sector.

“It is going to be a disaster for the telecom industry. Dismissal of review petition will lead to a duopoly situation, which is not good for consumers. Small ISPs will not be able to survive unless government steps in to review AGR definition," Internet Service Providers Association of India president Rajesh Chharia said.

Analysts were also worried about the development. “We wonder how weaker operators like Vodafone Idea will make this payment, and not that Bharti Airtel is getting any respite as the amount has to be paid up,” said Gaurang Shah, vice president at Geojit Financial Services Ltd. “It isn’t easy to raise tariffs and retain customers. It remains to be seen how companies now respond to this decision because the court has twice spelled it out for them.”

For two decades, the TSPs had challenged the way authorities calculated their AGR, a share of which is paid as licence and spectrum fees. But in October, the court upheld the government’s method while rejecting the companies’ plea to exclude revenue from non-telecommunications businesses.

The top court by its October 24, 2019 verdict had directed the cash-strapped TSPs to pay up Rs 90,000 crore—around 3 per cent of AGR as spectrum charges and 8 per cent as licence fees.

The court had said that except for termination fee and roaming charges, all revenues coming to telecom service provider would be counted in AGR.

Tags: supreme court