Thursday, Apr 25, 2024 | Last Update : 01:04 PM IST

  Business   In Other News  16 Apr 2018  NPAs to rise by Rs 8,000 crore

NPAs to rise by Rs 8,000 crore

PTI
Published : Apr 16, 2018, 12:43 am IST
Updated : Apr 16, 2018, 12:43 am IST

Gitanjali, among others, is the major account which has turned bad in the Q4 of FY18.

A consortium of 21 banks had first extended working capital loan to it in 2010-11.
 A consortium of 21 banks had first extended working capital loan to it in 2010-11.

New Delhi: Non performing assets (NPAs) or bad loans in the banking sector are set to shoot up by at least Rs 8,000 crore as advances to the scam-hit Gitanjali Gems group have turned bad during the quarter ended March 31.

Banks will have to make provisioning of Rs 8,000 crore for Gitanjali alone as there has been no servicing of the working capital loan during the fourth quarter of last fiscal, sources said.

Gitanjali, among others, is the major account which has turned bad in the Q4 of FY18.

Gross NPAs of all the banks in the country amounted to Rs 8,40,958 crore in December, led by industry loans followed by services and agriculture sectors, as per the government estimates.

Gitanjali is promoted by Mehul Choksi, uncle of billionaire diamantaire Nirav Modi, who defrauded PNB of over Rs 13,000 crore by getting fake Letters of Undertaking/ Credit (LoU/LoCs) issued from one of the bank’s branches in Mumbai.

A consortium of 21 banks had first extended working capital loan to it in 2010-11. In 2014, ICICI Bank became the lead banker as it had highest exposure of about Rs 900 crore and in line with the revised RBI guidelines.

Till December 2017, the loans to Gitanjali Gems were standard and regular debt servicing was being done. There is no servicing of debt in the last quarter ended March 31, so it has to be declared NPA by all banks, said a bank official of the consortium.

In 2015, the consortium had restructured working capital loans given to Gitanjali under the joint lenders' forum (JLF) mechanism.

The Gitanjali exposure was classified as a special mention account-2 in 2014 after the company failed to fulfil its payment obligations for more than 60 days, triggering the formation of a JLF.    

Tags: non performing assets, gitanjali gems