Thursday, Jul 09, 2020 | Last Update : 07:08 AM IST

106th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2237241231929448 Tamil Nadu118594711161636 Delhi102831742173165 Gujarat37636267441978 Uttar Pradesh2996819627313 Telangana2761216287313 Karnataka2681511100417 West Bengal2383715790804 Rajasthan2140416575472 Andhra Pradesh211979745252 Haryana1799913645279 Madhya Pradesh1562711768622 Bihar12525933898 Assam12523833016 Odisha10097670354 Jammu and Kashmir89315399143 Punjab67494554175 Kerala5895345228 Chhatisgarh3415272814 Uttarakhand3230262143 Jharkhand3018210422 Goa190311568 Tripura171612481 Manipur14307710 Himachal Pradesh107876410 Puducherry104351714 Nagaland6443030 Chandigarh4924017 Arunachal Pradesh270922 Mizoram1971390 Sikkim125650 Meghalaya94432
  Business   In Other News  03 Apr 2019  Circular has no effect in law: Apex court

Circular has no effect in law: Apex court

THE ASIAN AGE. | J. VENKATESAN
Published : Apr 3, 2019, 12:20 am IST
Updated : Apr 3, 2019, 12:20 am IST

The court held that reference to IBC can be made only on a case-to-case basis and that there cannot be a blanket direction to that effect.

The court held that reference to IBC can be made only on a case-to-case basis and that there cannot be a blanket direction to that effect. (Representational image)
 The court held that reference to IBC can be made only on a case-to-case basis and that there cannot be a blanket direction to that effect. (Representational image)

New Delhi: Quashing the circular, a Bench of Justices Rohinton Nariman and Vineet Saran held that a generic circular directing banks to take recourse to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was beyond the powers of Section 35AA of the Banking Regulation Act. The court held that reference to IBC can be made only on a case-to-case basis and that there cannot be a blanket direction to that effect.

Writing the judgment, Justice Nariman said, "the impugned circular nowhere says that the RBI has had due regard to the conditions in which and the objects for which such institutions have been established, their statutory responsibilities, and the effect the business of such financial institutions is likely to have on trends in the money and capital markets.”

Further, it is clear that the impugned circular applies to banking and non-banking institutions alike, as banking and non-banking institutions are often members in a joint lenders’ forum, which jointly lend sums of money to debtors. Such non-banking financial institutions are, therefore, inseparable from banking institutions insofar as the application of the impugned circular is concerned. It is very difficult to segregate the non-banking financial institutions from banks so as to make the circular applicable to them.

While declaring the circular as ultra vires as a whole, the bench declared it to be of no effect in law. Consequently, all actions taken under the said circular, including actions by which the Insolvency Code has been triggered must fall along with the said circular. As a result, the court stalled further proceedings before the tribunal of all cases in which debtors have been proceeded against by financial creditors under Section 7 of the Insolvency Code.

Tags: apex court, rohinton nariman, banking regulation act