Thursday, Sep 24, 2020 | Last Update : 09:22 PM IST

184th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra122438091634833015 Andhra Pradesh6317495518215410 Tamil Nadu5473374919718871 Karnataka5268764233778145 Uttar Pradesh3588932895945135 Delhi2492592133045014 West Bengal2283021989834421 Odisha184122149379763 Telangana1726081419301042 Bihar169856155824870 Assam159320129130578 Kerala13863398720554 Gujarat1247671051913337 Rajasthan116881972841352 Haryana113075908841177 Madhya Pradesh108167836182007 Punjab99930754092860 Chhatisgarh8618347653680 Jharkhand7267358543626 Jammu and Kashmir65026421151024 Uttarakhand4177729000501 Goa2875322726360 Puducherry2319118065467 Tripura2227215441245 Himachal Pradesh124387836125 Chandigarh102987411123 Manipur9010683859 Arunachal Pradesh7385540813 Nagaland5544445110 Meghalaya4733252838 Sikkim2447190529 Mizoram158510120
  Business   Companies  05 Jun 2018  Walmart-Flipkart deal to endanger jobs: Trade unions

Walmart-Flipkart deal to endanger jobs: Trade unions

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE
Published : Jun 5, 2018, 8:53 am IST
Updated : Jun 5, 2018, 8:53 am IST

As many as 127 groups have now come together to oppose the Walmart-Flipkart deal.

In India, 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) is allowed in e-commerce for marketplaces.
 In India, 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) is allowed in e-commerce for marketplaces.

New Delhi: Over 100 trade organisations on Monday opposed the $16-billion Walmart-Flipkart deal, stating that it would cause “irreversible damage” to small traders and endanger jobs for thousands.

The associations, including Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) and All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS), released an open statement highlighting the deal’s “multifaceted dangers” to the economy, and called for its nullification.

 

The bodies also argued that allowing the deal to go through would create an American duopoly (Walmart and Amazon) in the Indian retail sector and also lead to control of consumer data by these multi-national corporations (MNCs).

“Walmart is well-known for its global supply chain, especially of cheap goods from China, which will hurt local manufacturers and suppliers. The worst affected will be small brick and mortar retail stores along with SMEs and suppliers of goods including farmers,” said Mohan Gurnani, president, Chamber of Associations of Maharashtra Industry and Trade (CAMIT).

Last month, Walmart had announced the acquisition of 77 per cent stake in Flipkart for about $16 billion (Rs 1.05 lakh crore) -- marking the largest e-commerce deal so far in the country. In India, 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) is allowed in e-commerce for marketplaces.

 

As many as 127 groups have now come together to oppose the Walmart-Flipkart deal.

Walmart India chief corporate affairs officer Rajneesh Kumar said the company is committed to India for the long term.

“We have been running Cash and Carry business in India for almost a decade now and helping small kiranas succeed and become modern. We are sourcing locally with more than 95 per cent merchandise coming from within the country,” Kumar said.

He countered allegations that the deal would lead to job losses, saying the transaction will in fact lead to creation of lakhs of new jobs and help thousands of local suppliers and manufacturers access the consumers through Flipkart’s marketplace model, where the government has allowed 100 per cent FDI. When contacted, Flipkart did not respond to the query.

 

The unions were of the view that if the deal was allowed, two American retail giants -- Walmart and Amazon (which is present in India through a marketplace model) -- could create a ‘duopoly’ that would be too powerful to be regulated. They also urged the BJP government -- which had strongly opposed Walmart's entry into India -- to frame an e-commerce policy (which is in the works) before allowing the deal.

Members of the panel alleged that e-commerce firms seek to own and control key data of consumers and warned against misuse of such data in today's digitally empowered society. 

Amitava Guha from CITU said Walmart has a long history of being anti-trade union and disregarding social security laws, and added that even if Walmart and Amazon employ a few thousand more, they are unlikely to neutralise the massive unemployment loss associated with the collapse of the smaller retailers in the country.

 

Earlier, bodies like Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) and All India Online Vendors Association (AIOVA) moved the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against the deal.

Tags: walmart, flipkart, deal, trade unions, job
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi