CM Kejriwal found ‘not guilty’ of giving false info before EC

PTI

Metros, Delhi

The aforesaid discussion shows that these offences are not made out.

It further noted that the Election Commission had not take any action in this case despite the fact that the complainant had brought the issue to its notice. (Representational image)

New Delhi: A court here has absolved Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal of charges of giving false information in an affidavit filed in run up to 2013 assembly polls.

Additional chief metropolitan magistrate Samar Vishal discharged Kejriwal in the case saying “merely due to the fact that a person has other residential addresses apa-rt from where he has enrolled himself as a voter, cannot be a ground to presume that he is not a resident of that place from where he registered as a voter”.

It was alleged in the complaint that Kejriwal had filed a “false affidavit” along with his nomination papers before the Election Commission on November 16, 2013 for contesting the 2013-Delhi assembly election.The criminal complaint filed by Neeraj Saxena on behalf of the NGO, Maulik Bharat Trust, had alleged that Kejriwal had concealed his correct address and suppressed the market value of his property in his affidavit given before the Election Commission.

It was alleged that the AAP leader had falsely given the address of Delhi so as to qualify for contesting the polls in the capital while he was living at Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh. In its order, the court said that there was no evidence that the accused was not residing at the address given in his voting identity card.

“A place of resident is a place where a person ordinarily reside. This may or may not be his permanent address. Therefore, it cannot be said that by registering himself at this address 41, Bunglow, Hanuman Road, New Delhi- 110001 the accused has committed the offence of making any false declaration for the purpose of inclusion of his name in electoral roll...,” it said.

It further noted that the Election Commission had not take any action in this case despite the fact that the complainant had brought the issue to its notice.“The accused has been summoned only for the aforesaid alleged misinformation. The aforesaid discussion shows that these offences are not made out. Therefore, the accused is discharged from this case,” it said.

A Delhi court had on March 22, 2016 summoned Kejriwal as accused in the case, saying he had prima facie “wilfully concealed” and “suppressed” the details.   

Read more...