New Delhi: Finance minister Arun Jaitley on Monday said the finance ministry is debating the two innovative suggestions made by the latest Economic Survey – Universal Basic Income (UBI) and creation of bad bank – to deal with the unacceptable levels of bad loans.
He, however, said the idea of UBI does not seem to be a feasible policy option at this point of time given the “political limitations”. While inaugurating the one-week teachers’ workshop at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi, the minister also emphasised policy makers to continuously upgrade their knowledge on different subjects. “I think it’s equally meant for policy makers because they should also be acquainted with the facts for informed policy making,” he noted.
On innovative ideas of the Survey, he said it remains a challenge on how to allocate subsidies in a targeted manner. “This year also it (survey) initiated a very important idea as to how do we subsidise...substitute the entire set of subsidies...we want to replace it by a Universal Basic Income (to a defined section of poor) and that UBI expedites their pulling out of the present state of poverty that they live in.”
The Survey, prepared by Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian, also strongly pushed for a bad bank in which all non-performing assets of the banks are vested so that the rest of the banking system could carry on with its own activities, he said.
“I have been having debates with him on both his current suggestions. I’m fully supportive of his idea (UBI) but realising limitations of Indian politics, I have always expressed to him the fear that once he moots ideas like the UBI, we will be landing in a situation where people will stand up in Parliament and demand continuation of the present subsidies and over and above that let’s have the UBI, something that the Budget will not be able to afford,” he said.
The finance minister said that the Economic Survey, which precedes Budget by a day, is not a propaganda material but highlights the stark reality of the economic situation. “The document had traditional format, but in the past two years Dr Subramanian and his team have deviated from the traditional format. It’s drafted differently. In addition to analysing present state of affairs, it also always contains a chapter or two which are provocative,” he said.