10MASTERCARD.jpg

Some 46 million people in Britain could potentially benefit from a legal case brought against Mastercard dema-nding £14 billion ($19 billion) in damages for alleg-edly charging excessive fees, according to court do-cuments filed in London.

The case brought by a former chief financial services ombudsman alleges the payments company charged unlawfully high fees to stores when shoppers swiped their debit or credit cards and these were passed on to consumers in higher prices.

Mastercard is alleged to have done this for 16 years between 1992 and 2008, in more than 600 pages of documents filed at the Competition Appeal Tribunal on Thursday.

“This was almost an invisible tax,” Walter Merricks, who is bringing the case, told the BBC.

“Mastercard has behaved disgracefully in this. They have not had the reasonableness to accept that what this was doing was damaging UK consumers.”

Mastercard said in a statement it denied any wrongdoing.

“We continue to firmly disagree with the basis of this claim and we intend to oppose it vigorously,” the world's second-largest payments network said. The lawsuit comes after the EU’s antitrust regulator found in 2014 Mastercard’s fees to store owners to process international payments within the EU were excessive.

Law firm Quinn Emanuel said the lawsuit was the largest damages claim in British history and would be brought under a law meaning consumers would automatically be claimants unless they opt out.

Any person living in Britain who used a credit card, cash or cheques and was over 16 years old in the period covered by the lawsuit will automatically be part of the claim.

If the 14 billion pound claim was shared equally between the number of eligible claimants, each person could receive more than 300 pounds each, according to a Reuters’ calculation.

A lawyer working on the case said Mastercard charged shops fees in excess of one per cent for card use on international transactions between 1992 and 2008.

Although the EU’s anti-trust regulator only ruled Mastercard's international fees were illegal, this impacted British consumers as it was the default fee used in Britain.