Disappointing BCCI verdict

The very idea of reforms was to stop this pillaging of the game’s funds and to root out corruption.

SC warns BCCI office-bearers of serious consequences

The CoA had asked the apex court to hand over the 'governance, management and administration' of the BCCI to them.

The apex court passed its verdict on July 18, 2016 accepting the majority of the reforms suggested by the three-member panel.

Gurunath’s comment can be perceived as an apparent reference to Chennai Super Kings’ return to IPL next year after a two-year suspension.

Former India women's captain Diana Edulji was expecting a role in after the BCCI reforms but not the one she has now been entrusted with.

Supreme Court asked the centre and BCCI to suggest names for the post of BCCI administrators in sealed covers by January 27.

By raising legal issues afresh, they are only hoping to prolong the battle and retain their fiefdom.

The Amicus Curiae also submitted 9 names for the post of the BCCI administrators.

Of the 8 members in fray, Mohammad Azharuddin was the only one ‘rejected’.

The BCCI needed a written directive from the Lodha Panel to go ahead with its selection committee meeting.