Tuesday, May 26, 2020 | Last Update : 01:28 PM IST

63rd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra52667157861695 Tamil Nadu170828731119 Gujarat144686636888 Delhi140536771276 Rajasthan73004056167 Madhya Pradesh68593571300 Uttar Pradesh64973660169 West Bengal38161414278 Andhra Pradesh2886189256 Bihar273773313 Karnataka218270544 Punjab2081191340 Telangana1920116456 Jammu and Kashmir166880923 Odisha14386497 Haryana121380216 Kerala8975326 Assam549634 Jharkhand4051484 Uttarakhand349584 Chhatisgarh292670 Chandigarh2661874 Himachal Pradesh223634 Tripura1981650 Goa67190 Puducherry49170 Manipur3640 Meghalaya15121 Nagaland300 Arunachal Pradesh210 Mizoram110 Sikkim100

Government: Can’t shift car shed to Kanjurmarg

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Sep 20, 2019, 4:04 am IST
Updated : Sep 20, 2019, 4:04 am IST

An appeal against this order of the high court has been filed in the Supreme Court, where it is pending hearing, the government counsel said.

Bombay high court
 Bombay high court

Mumbai: The state government on Thursday informed the Bombay high court that the metro car shed proposed to be set up at Aarey Colony would not be shifted to Kanjurmarg as such a move was unfeasible. It also said the green belt could not be given a forest tag “just because it has greenery”.

A division bench of Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Bharti Dangre was hearing a petition filed by an NGO, Vanashakti, which demanded that Aarey Colony in suburban Goregaon be declared a forest and an ecologically-sensitive zone.

Activists have been opposing the proposed felling of over 2,600 trees in Aarey to make way for the car shed and demanding the relocation of the depot.

“Aarey cannot be declared a forest just because there is greenery there. Aarey was formed in the past as a milk colony and to keep cattle and horse stables,” Anil Sakhare, the special counsel for the state, told the court. Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni argued that another bench of the high court had in October last year dismissed a similar petition filed by an activist, Zoru Bathena, seeking the forest tag for Aarey.

In the petition, Mr Bathena had also challenged the proposed construction of the car shed. “The high court bench, while rejecting that petition, noted that it was erroneous to term Aarey a forest,” Mr Kumbhakoni said.

An appeal against this order of the high court has been filed in the Supreme Court, where it is pending hearing, the government counsel said.

“When the matter has been already heard and concluded by the high court, it need not be entertained again,” Mr Kumbhakoni argued.

Tags: aarey colony, bombay high court
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT