Monday, Jun 01, 2020 | Last Update : 02:33 AM IST

68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100

'Macho' collection culture to disrupt museum collection

Published : Oct 23, 2019, 11:05 am IST
Updated : Oct 23, 2019, 11:05 am IST

Study suggest that male specimens preferred by animal collectors.

Male birds that are significantly more colourful or ornamental than females – birds of paradise. (Photo: AFP)
 Male birds that are significantly more colourful or ornamental than females – birds of paradise. (Photo: AFP)

Washington: Museum collections of birds and mammals may be disproportionately skewed to favour males, even if female members of the species outnumber males in the wild, according to research published Wednesday.

Natalie Cooper, a researcher in the department of life sciences at the Natural History Museum in London, and her colleagues analysed the sex of almost 2.5 million specimens from five international collections, some dating back over a century.

Although as many as half of the bird specimens were not labelled by sex, of the ones that were, only 40 percent were female. Female mammals represented 48 per cent of the collections identified by sex. "We suspected that some bias towards males would be found because science is done by people, and people have inherent biases towards males," Cooper told AFP.

What surprised the researcher, though, was that there was no change in the ratios from collections dating back 130 years to more recent collections. "In museums, collectors in the 19th century were mostly male, and though this is changing, it's still a male-dominated field," she added.

Collection methods may be part of the problem. In some species, the males may be larger or showier, making them easier to spot and collect. "Hunters are more likely to see and target these individuals," Cooper said.

"So it's important to ensure smaller female individuals are not being overlooked." When scientists disproportionately collect male deer, for example, which are larger than their female counterparts, the specimens studied represent a larger average size than in the wild.

"By ignoring females we don't get a full picture of life," said Cooper. Even when female specimens were larger or showier than males, the study found the median percentage of females was still only 44.6 percent. The same trend applied for male mammals with "ornaments," such as horns, antlers or tusks. But even in species where females also have ornaments, collectors preferred males.

The trend carried over to bird collections, too. Male birds that are significantly more colourful or ornamental than females – birds of paradise, for example – were preferred by collectors, the author said. The males in these species were also more likely to be selected for exhibits.

Tags: museum, birds, culture