Wednesday, Aug 05, 2020 | Last Update : 12:57 AM IST

133rd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra45795629935616142 Tamil Nadu2682852087844349 Andhra Pradesh176333956251604 Karnataka145830692722704 Delhi1391561252264033 Uttar Pradesh100310572711817 West Bengal80984568841785 Telangana6894649675563 Gujarat65704485612529 Bihar6203140760349 Assam4816233429115 Rajasthan4667932832732 Haryana3779631226448 Odisha3768124483258 Madhya Pradesh3508225414912 Kerala279561629988 Jammu and Kashmir2239614856417 Punjab1901512491462 Jharkhand140705199129 Chhatisgarh10109761369 Uttarakhand8008484795 Goa7075511460 Tripura5520367528 Puducherry4147253758 Manipur301818147 Himachal Pradesh2879171013 Nagaland24056594 Arunachal Pradesh179011053 Chandigarh120671520 Meghalaya9173305 Sikkim7832971 Mizoram5022820
  India   All India  21 Nov 2019  Minister can’t interfere in investigation by agencies: Supreme Court

Minister can’t interfere in investigation by agencies: Supreme Court

THE ASIAN AGE. | PRAMOD KUMAR
Published : Nov 21, 2019, 2:05 am IST
Updated : Nov 21, 2019, 2:05 am IST

Khan had tendered an unconditional apology for his comments.

Supreme Court of India
 Supreme Court of India

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday was told that a minister was under constitutional mandate not to interfere with the ongoing investigation in a criminal case and if he does so, he is liable under the constitutional tort and the remedy is compensation in appropriate cases.

“The failure of the state to discharge its constitutional obligation would construe a constitutional tort and make it liable for damages under public law. Similarly, the minister, a constitutional functionary, would, by the same token, be liable for damages if he commits a constitutional tort by violating the fundamental rights of the citizens,” senior counsel Harish Salve told the five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra.   

 

The issue is rooted in the then Uttar Pradesh minister Azam Khan describing as “political conspiracy” the alleged gang rape of a minor girl and her mother on the national highway near Buland-Shahr while on their way to their ancestral village on July 29, 2016.

Though Mr Khan had tendered an unconditional apology for his comments, the court decided to examine whether a public servant could be saddled with additional restrictions on his free speech particularly in the matters begin probed.

Tags: supreme court, azam khan