Thursday, Aug 13, 2020 | Last Update : 04:57 AM IST

140th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra53560136843518306 Tamil Nadu3086492506805159 Andhra Pradesh2445491547492203 Karnataka1886111055993398 Delhi1461341316574131 Uttar Pradesh126722767212120 West Bengal98459671202059 Bihar8274154139450 Telangana8075157586637 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3433121832109 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland30119738 Arunachal Pradesh223115923 Chandigarh1595100425 Meghalaya11154986 Sikkim9105101 Mizoram6203230
  India   All India  11 Jul 2020  Vikas Dubey encounter: Mumbai lawyer moves Supreme Court, seeks CBI probe

Vikas Dubey encounter: Mumbai lawyer moves Supreme Court, seeks CBI probe

THE ASIAN AGE. | SHAHAB ANSARI
Published : Jul 11, 2020, 12:28 am IST
Updated : Jul 11, 2020, 12:28 am IST

Advocate Dube termed it to be a fake and extrajudicial killing.

Undated photo shows Vikas Dubey with his close aide Amar Dubey (L) who was killed in an encounter recently. ( PTI)
 Undated photo shows Vikas Dubey with his close aide Amar Dubey (L) who was killed in an encounter recently. ( PTI)

Mumbai: A Navi Mumbai-based lawyer Atal Bihari Dubey on Friday wrote to the Supreme Court requesting it to take suo moto (on its own) cognisance of gangster Vikas Dubey’s killing and order a CBI investigation into the case. Advocate Dubey said that the encounter killing of Vikas Dubey by Uttar Pradesh was a violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution.

Terming it to be a fake and extrajudicial killing, advocate Dubey demanded judicial review of the encounter. He also requested in his letter that the court should take suo moto cognisance against Uttar Pradesh government and the state police for not following guidelines issued by the apex court.

 

The letter stated that they had been apprehensive about Vikas Dubey getting killed by Uttar Pradesh police in the same way as the other accused in the Kanpur police murder case. The police, he said, had violated guidelines issued by the court in the PUSL vs State of Maharashtra matter.

"There is no provision in Indian law which gives authority to the police to directly kill accused mercilessly by creating such a scene. The police officers are not above the law and cannot take law into their hands," the complaint read.  

The letter added that it was not the duty of a police officer to kill the accused. The police could only arrest the accused and put them up for trial. However, in Vikas  Dubey’s case, the police arrested him and also punished him, the letter noted.

 

The lawyer said that the Constitution guarantees fair trial to every citizen and the accused shall be punished as per the rule of law. “Vikas Dubey himself surrendered before the Madhya Pradesh Police and he was apprehensive that he might be killed. Therefore he said ‘main Vikas Dubey hu, Kanpur wala’.  This makes it clear that he was not having any intention to flee and he wanted to save himself from a fake encounter,” he said.

Dubey requested the court to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register an FIR under section 302 (murder) of IPC against the police personnel involved in the encounter and conduct a probe under the supervision of a retired Supreme Court judge.

 

Tags: vikas dubey, vikas dubey encounter, supreme court of india
Location: India