:: OP-ED
40 years in cyberspace
Jayati Ghosh
Nov.03 : Forty years ago, on October 29, 1969, a network link was established between two mainframe computers, one in the University of California, Los Angeles, and the other at the Stanford Research Institute, both in the United States, through a system known as "data packet switching". This network was known as the ARPANET, because the idea originated within an informal research group at the United State Government’s Department of Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). This group was led by the head of the agency, J.C.R. Licklider, a visionary scientist who as early as 1960 had called for a network of computers connected to one another by wide-band communication lines which, he anticipated, could provide the functions of libraries as well as information storage and retrieval and other symbiotic functions.
ARPANET became the technical core of what would eventually become the Internet. The problem was one of connecting separate physical networks to form one logical network. By 1973, a system was worked out whereby the differences between network protocols were hidden by using a common "internetworking protocol", which meant that the concept of the network could be separated from its physical implementation. This spread of Internetworking began to form into a global network that eventually came to be called "the Internet", based on standardised protocols that were officially implemented in 1982.
Originally, the development and use of the Internet was confined to the military, the government and some privileged universities in the US. Over the 1980s, the technology and the networking possibilities began to be spread across the world. ARPANET was overtaken by the rapidity of technological change elsewhere, and the project ended in 1990 to be replaced by newer networking technologies. Commercial activities were allowed by the US Congress in 1992, leading to the emergence of private Internet service providers and new commercial applications. By the end of the 1980s, the Internet had entered Asia, with institutions in Japan, Singapore, China and even Thailand becoming early users.
In 1989, Tim Berners-Lee, a scientist working in the European government-funded CERN in Geneva, invented a network-based implementation of hypertext that could find and organise files and information, effectively becoming a way of organising the Internet. He made this technology publicly available, and it resulted in the World Wide Web. The computer he used at CERN became the first Web server. Web browsers like Mosaic and Netscape were developed in the early 1990s.
The rest is not yet history, because technological change in this area continues apace, and is even now dispersed to many parts of the world. Although the original development was largely concentrated in official defence and scientific circles, subsequently invention and innovation has become extraordinarily decentralised, so much so that the legions of books on the history of the Internet find it difficult to record the developments accurately and comprehensively.
New technologies and applications are constantly being developed, and the remarkable possibilities that already have been opened up by instantaneous human communication almost defy imagination. It has been said that the Internet is as much a collection of communities as it is a collection of technologies, and the technology is being constantly pushed in particular directions by meeting needs of these Internet communities as well as using members to further develop the technology.
The euphoria generated by this and related technologies was at least partly responsible for the dotcom bubble, which led to significant over-investment in some commercial applications that could not generate profits. However, while the bursting of that bubble did lead to an economic recession in 2000 and 2001, the proliferation of technological development has continued.
And, meanwhile, it has changed the contours of human life with amazing rapidity. While the digital divide does indeed remain a major issue, those who have access to the Internet have found their lives transformed. For many people who keep discovering or benefiting from particular applications, it can seem to be too good to be true.
The development of mobile phone technology has changed the nature of access, as more and more people in the developing world turn to mobile phones to access the Internet. In developing Asia, it is estimated that the majority of Internet users now access the net by phone instead of computer.
Email is often considered to be the most successful Internet application, though it actually predates the Internet. Other applications have multiplied and changed life so quickly that it must have significant social implications. The Internet has changed the way people keep in touch with each other, find out about each other, learn, work, purchase goods and services, handle many aspects of daily life, listen to music, find other entertainment, even make friends.
Obviously the technology is going to keep on changing. But while we can all celebrate this wonderful technology that has already shown so much potential for transformation, the hard questions about the Internet may emerge now. The very success of the Internet has meant that there are many more people (and companies) with diverse interests who have a stake in it. Although non-commercial use remains high, the Internet is increasingly becoming a support structure for commercial services provided for profit, and this is intensified by the fact that its own services are increasingly becoming commodities.
Already there are debates about how the Internet should be controlled and how to maintain the decentralisation that has been so productive and implicitly democratic. There are conflicts over domain name space, the form of the next generation IP addresses, the control of content that appears on the Internet, and much else. If the Internet is really to remain too good to be true, these are questions that must concern all of us.
Other Head lines
- Ajeeb Mumbai ki ghazab kahani
- Not angry enough
- Trust the Almighty
- What after ‘what next?’
- Victimspeak
- Legislator haazir ho!
- Minority report
- I believe in pujas
- Talking points
- I feel God in music
- Where are the hawkers?
- Stigma of the question mark haunts and hurts
- Turning towards ‘list journalism’
- A dining table drought
- A cyclone’s naamkaran
- Babus return to school
- Doomsday is nigh
- Hijab: Rebellion, choice or diktat?
- A song and a fatwa
- A ghost who stalks
- Connect
- Dhoni XI overrated?
- I have a connection
- Bringing up Manu
- Oz seeks an Asian friend
- Tawang and the ghosts of 1962
- He is very dependable
- E for electronic, W for waste
- Human rights in Asean
- When the Wall fell in ’89...
- India’s resource curse
- Painting horses, in exile
- Babus pushed to perform
- Celeb journalism here to stay
- Happy endings for nowhere boys
- CERN: Will outcome match ambition?
- Fish out of water?
- Innovate where you are
- Blair’s spell over?
- For whose development?
- Company of noble women
- Don’t uncork the bubbly yet!
- B’day bullies
- Dilli ka babu
- A misunderstood loner
- The Royal Banquet
- Superpower India should match karma with dharma
- The magic of ’69
- Show you care
- Drop the ‘N’ in NCP?
- Bangla trippers
- Frozen smiles, limp handshakes
- Lofty goals left unachieved
- Cry for recognition
- A zest for life
- India’s first nuclear man
- If our small investors found Sensex sexy...
- Pak fears 3 fronts, not 2
- And now a CMO…
- All hail Mumbai CM
- The rise of a racist
- 250 mothers will die of childbirth in India today
- Cantilevered designs
- Life’s meter
- The vegetable war
- India must take a ‘free Tibet’ stand
- Waziristan: Pak Army forgets lessons of the Raj
- Behind China’s sabre-rattling
- Global imbalances
- Love-hate thy neighbour
- I pray for humanity
- Notes on Indian Vietnam
- Saryu canal project in troubled waters
- The holes in Pak’s heart
- Who killed the world economy?
- I believe in all Gods
- Wilde adventures
- Games ban hurts Fijians the most
- Live your truth
- Rules of engagement
- Mother Teresa is very much ours
- How Orissa moved Gandhi
- RSS, here I come
- In praise of honesty
- A Rouge warning
- A letter of dissent
- Flushing away our precious resource
- A tribute to a living legend
- Beneath the surface
- Madrasas: A two-school theory
- Power to choose
- Time for India to wake up to China
- The season of joy
- Crimes of environment
- Migration’s gender angle
- Beards: A trim history
- Talk to God
- Emerging states call for IMF vote reform
- Prayers always help
- Sen and the art of justice
- Curing ‘pilotitis’
- Austerity?
- Putting an austere ring around paucity of ideas
- Aam aadmi served up as art in London
- Have faith in karma
- We ignored the walker
- Between Pak & US
- Go Hollywood
- The judges’ club
- Close encounters
- GM food: Risks and benefits
- Gene mutation and food
- Free market brings its own media censorship
- The wisdom of Ravan
- Rising prices: What is the govt doing?
- A bloody crisis
- Pak must act fast
- PM loves his technocrats
- The wild life in S. Africa
- It’s time to bring Ismail home
- Meditate regularly
- Lifelong wait for death
- Dalai’s Tawang visit plan makes China red
- China in a hurry to get to Gilgit
- Missed policy opportunity
- Decoding H1N1
- Encashing Gandhi legacy, one memento at a time
- Goods & services tax needs streamlining
- Culturally rich India needs robust National Awards
- A new hazard in cattle class
- A RAW deal?
- Ramzan: Some thoughts
- Aussie-desi mindset
- Manipur crying for help
- Alien attraction
- Day of listening
- Great Indian ‘NOC’ trick
- Cosmetic austerity
- Modi: Last man standing
- Return of the Capitalist
- China and Xinjiang
- Unhealthy effects of FTAs
- ‘Green shoots’ will take time to bloom
- The legacy of YSR
- Natural reforms
- A case of stage fright
- Stand firm
- Mocking lizards
- Mindset of the mindless
- The Kolkata syndrome
- A plate full of toxins
- Hardwired lives
- Set people free
- Dilli ke aage jahan...
- Demystifying tax
- Jinnah and Kashmir
- GDP and India’s hungry underbelly
- Advani’s fall: From Iron Man to Fevicol Man
- Services exports need new markets
- Media’s McCarthyism
- Battling the zoozoos
- What’s with the ‘h’, Jon?
- Chinese checkers in J&K
- Bobby to Chintuji
- Nuke forensics to deter Pak
- Camelot outlives King Arthur
- Music inspires
- A call to honour
- Gender bender
- Govt puts ‘right to food’ on hold in drought year
- Southern discomfort
- ‘CPM and the Left have become almost irrelevant’
- For our courts, all speech is free unless it’s in contempt
- Platitudes, not concessions, will dominate trade meet
- Makeover jitters
- The house of Mr Jinnah
- Jaswant now single, and quite happy to mingle
- A healthy debate
- Kisan Incorporated
- A matter of time
- Existential angst
- No train goes to Darjeeling
- GM: Food for thought
- The Goulden Treasury
- Law and the public good
- Aye mere watan ke logon, zara...
- India’s Asean pact brings micro-pain, macro-gain
- Swine flu scare
- Bloody love stories

