:: Editorial
Red China is 60
Oct.01 : As it celebrates the 60th anniversary of the 1949 Communist revolution led by Chairman Mao Zedong today, there is much that the People’s Republic of China can legitimately be proud of. Led by the engine of economic growth, in recent decades its comprehensive national power has grown exponentially. But easily the most striking aspect of the rise of the Chinese system has been the accretion to the capacities of its military establishment, which was among the four "modernisations" underlined by the late Deng Xiaoping, who inspired the dragon’s resurgence in the era after Mao. More than anything else, it is arguably this factor that has provoked considerable latent unease in China’s neighbourhood, causing the subject of keeping a rising China within a stable framework of rules to become a staple of regional and international political concerns. In the event, it is interesting that Beijing should be asking India and Pakistan to seek a resolution of the Kashmir issue through peaceful and friendly consultations, and has even offered to play a "constructive role" in settling the problem. The observation of assistant foreign affairs minister Hu Zhengyue to this effect was made to a group of visiting journalists and does not carry the imprimatur of the highest organs of state. Nevertheless, China watchers are known to track little and big developments, and nuances of wordplay, for that country doesn’t have a settled system of political articulation on account of the system it runs.
The only concession to Indian sensitivities in the Chinese statement is that it refers to the Kashmir question as a "bilateral" issue (between India and Pakistan). It is well known that this country has always discouraged any international solicitousness as regards Kashmir. Pakistan, on the other hand, has chosen the opposite course. It likes the idea of "internationalising" the Kashmir question in the hope that this will help further its claims. Seen in this light, Beijing’s low-key but unexpected activism on Kashmir is certain to please Islamabad but not New Delhi. There is also no little irony in the fact that China sits on a chunk of Kashmir’s territory gifted to it by Pakistan even as it complacently urges its South Asian neighbours to deal with the contention between them through peaceful and friendly consultations. Given this state of affairs, there is discernible presumptuousness on its part to offer to play the role of a disinterested broker.
China’s own record of settling problems that are a carryover from history is far from satisfactory. The Vietnamese know this to their cost in the case of the Paracel and Spratly Islands in Vietnam’s Eastern Sea and Diaoyu Islands in the East China Sea. Taiwan remains disputed territory. On the border marking Tibet’s contiguity with India, Beijing moved troops in 1962. Xinjiang in China’s northwest is not tranquil either, and is a region with a past that China seeks to dispute. A record such as this is hardly conducive to the offer of good offices to other countries. China should celebrate the anniversary of its revolution with gusto, but its advice to others, if it is not to provoke hilarity, should be grounded in realism.
Other Head lines
- Plain speaking in national interest
- Sugarcane row: Resolve quickly
- Just stand firm with US, China
- Bravo Sachin!
- Yesterday’s men out of tune in UP
- A delicate time for West Bengal
- Living legend soldiers on
- A new front in war on terror
- The manner of Maha politics
- Rattled Beijing needs watching
- Day of shame in Maharashtra
- Telecom battles to get tougher
- RSS shock and awe in BJP
- Disinvesting PSUs boon to investors
- India’s stimulus: To end, or not to end...
- Rein in pak for peace in asia
- Security: Citizens can’t be ignored
- Let others follow judges’ example
- Why are there so many holidays?
- A sorry mess in Karnataka
- Oil safety rules need overhaul
- Is anybody in Pak listening?
- Inflation: Ball in govt’s court
- Rajdhani attack warning to govt
- Paranoia apparent in Pak responses
- Give our airlines better, fairer deal
- On China, lower our expectations
- India’s toughest games lie ahead
- Dangers of swap deals with rebels
- Honeymoon for Cong continues
- An anti-climax in Afghanistan
- Make our schools better, then IITs
- Pak ISI & terror: Iran says it too
- It’s time to speak frankly to China
- The games within the Delhi Games
- Fears rise: Pak out of control?
- The industrial index phenomena
- Games 2010: Stop drift, take charge
- Sensible line on tackling Naxals
- Pak Army HQ hit: Questions remain
- Kabul attack: Pak gets more brazen
- Venki’s Nobel is time to introspect
- Heed UN’s call to protect migrants
- Floods in South a national calamity
- A reality check for rich nations
- Is Rio’s victory a slap for Obama?
- Bharti-MTN: Let it be a wake-up call
- A dissection of champions
- Air India strike has to end now
- Firm line with Pak was much needed
- G-20: Lofty vows, but no results
- Cricket, sex and extra cover
- NPT cannot be forced on India
- Climate: US has to act, not just preach
- Banks key focus of G-20 in Pittsburgh
- Fight Naxals with guns and butter
- Stakes are high in Maharashtra
- How real is Pak action on Hafiz?
- Bypolls: Warning sign for Congress?
- Is the worst over? Too early to say
- Is caste census a good idea now?
- China: As unease grows, act firmly
- A wake-up call on 2010 Games
- Why was a 5-day strike necessary?
- A first-class political debate
- Improve schools if India is to rise
- Misbehaviour just can’t be condoned
- Jet pilots must return to work
- Encounters a blot on our democracy
- Some refreshing plain speaking
- Little headway in WTO Delhi talks
- Climate plan must, for richer or poorer
- Pak actions need greater scrutiny
- A people’s man who delivered
- At WTO, protect India’s farmers
- A good sign, see if it is sustained
- Pakistan & US: So what’s new?
- Stay focused on space, carefully
- BJP needs new formula, big idea
- A truly global trade outlook
- A pathbreaking move by judges
- Govt’s firm line on Pak welcome
- It’s good to learn more languages
- Do more to end free trade fears
- Infrastructure: Get the basics right
- BJP’s Shimla show a wasted effort?
- Banning books is always bad
- A stable Kabul will help India

