:: Paranjoy Guha Thakurta
US gets locks and keys to bolt H1-B doors
By Paranjoy Guha Thakurta
APR 26 : As the recession in the West deepens, protectionism is on the rise. A bill has been introduced in the US Senate which, if it becomes law, would place severe restrictions on American employers engaging the services of foreign workers on H-1B non-immigrant visas. The bill has made India’s computer software development and business process outsourcing industry rather jittery.
Many Indians who are adept at information technology have perceived the US as a land of milk and honey. But even they are no longer rushing to catch the first flight to a country where free enterprise capitalism was supposed to offer unlimited economic opportunities to the talented and the enterprising. The evidence is in the form of a sharp fall in the number of applicants for H-1B visas this year.
H-1B visa holders can be "temporarily" hired — usually for three years, extendable for another three years — by US employers provided they are in "specialty occupations". The US Immigration & Nationality Act specifies a "speciality occupation" as one that requires theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialised knowledge in a field of human endeavour, including, but not limited to, architecture, engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, biotechnology, medicine and health, education, law, accounting, business, theology and the arts, and requiring the attainment of a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent as a minimum qualification. Fashion models are exempt from the minimum educational qualification provided they are "of distinguished merit and ability".
An official "strategic plan" document of the US Department of Labour states that "...H-1B workers may be hired even when a qualified US worker wants the job and a US worker can be displaced from the job in favour of the foreign worker". The bill in the Senate proposes that US employers first make an attempt in "good faith" to recruit an American worker before hiring a foreigner holding a H-1B visa.
Further, the bill proposes that employers be prohibited from hiring H-1B visa holders unless at least half its total employee strength comprises US citizens. "Our bill will put a stop to the outsourcing of American jobs and discrimination against American workers", says Dick Durbin, a Senator belonging to the Democratic Party from Illinois, who is also the Assistant Senate Majority Leader and one of the two sponsors of the bill.
The most-commonly voiced criticisms of the H-1B policy over the years has been that it replaces American workers, depresses salaries and is a form of subsidy to corporate bodies. It is claimed that the objectives of the policy are subverted by companies engaging foreign workers through contractors and by designating them as consultants. Some US critics have gone to the extent of describing H1-B visa holders as "indentured servants" or "slaves" because of their dependence on their employers.
This year, there has been a sudden drop in the number of people applying for H-1B visas (see box) even as those opposed to outsourcing of American jobs have become increasingly aggressive. Notable among them is Lou Dobbs, conservative television anchor of CNN. For years now, he has frequently highlighted and condemned "offshoring" of jobs. He has persisted in his campaign despite being accused of inciting xenophobia, besides mixing reportage with personal opinion and facts with advocacy. He has been described as a "raving protectionist", a "ratings hound" and as a person with an "intellectual midlife crisis".
Another right-wing radio talk show host, Rush Limbaugh, had the following to say to a caller on his radio programme: "If you’re sitting out waiting for a job that’s now being done by a slumdog in India and you’re waiting for the job to be cancelled, for the slumdog to be thrown out of work, and you to get the job, it ain’t going to happen, it’s not the way economics works…"
These two media personalities may or may not represent mainstream American opinion but they are certainly cashing in on a rising tide of protectionism in a country that has traditionally advocated free movement of goods and capital but baulked at similar norms governing the movement of people. Vivek Wadhwa, who arrived in the US as a "low-level programmer with a big investment bank" and went on to become a senior research fellow at Harvard Law School, an executive in residence at Duke University and who founded two computer software firms that employed over 1,200 people, was viciously attacked when he argued that American immigration policy is "chasing away talented foreigners who had previously served as a backbone of US science innovation". In an article in Business Week, he wrote how he had received over 1,000 email messages personally attacking him, disparaging his race and heritage and even threatening to bodily harm him.
This, indeed, is what protectionism in a time of recession is all about.
Paranjoy Guha Thakurta is an educator and commentator based in New Delhi
Other Columns
- Turning towards ‘list journalism’
- India’s resource curse
- Don’t uncork the bubbly yet!
- Saryu canal project in troubled waters
- Flushing away our precious resource
- Goods & services tax needs streamlining
- ‘Green shoots’ will take time to bloom
- Battling the zoozoos
- Platitudes, not concessions, will dominate trade meet
- India’s Asean pact brings micro-pain, macro-gain
- The magic of millet in a drought-prone country
- Overhaul fertiliser subsidy or prepare for a food crisis
- Recession, protectionism make WTO talks useless
- Plug holes to stop tax leaks, raise revenue
- In Ambani case, at stake is India’s natural resource
- FM’s next challenge: Make privatisation palatable
- Will FM heighten Monday blues or try to please all?
- Let’s rethink India’s messy mix of capitalism, socialism
- Bric cribs about doing business only in dollars
- The importance of Brics, South Africa included
- Right is wrong and Left is right at the Centre
- Can Pranab make tycoon and common man smile?
- The adventures of Messrs Baalu & Raja
- Will PM’s economics strike a market-welfare balance?
- Mayawati, Left can’t alter India’s economic course
- Buy IMF bonds, but let it first regain credibility
- RBI gets a pat as global downturn gets worse
- The end of tax havens?
- In defence of populism
- Greed pays no heed to need or prudence
- The alphabet soup of the ‘Great Recession’
- As fiscal deficits rise, it’s time to scrap FRBM Act
- A short political history of crime and punishment
- The accountant in Pranab comes out
- Between human need and want lolls a greedy demon
- Govt must build, repair to ease recession impact
- Millions lose jobs as world chooses food over clothes
- Why FIIs prefer India to China
- Capitalism’s left the building. Let’s live within our means
- How corrupt babus are raided, charged and then transferred
- India’s poor, illiterate voters are choosing the lesser evil
- 26/11 was aimed at hurting India’s growing economy
- Spectrum allocation row has cost India Rs 80,000 crore
- Are Indian stock exchanges cover for laundering money?
- Dr Doom predicted crisis, says worst is yet to come
- World financial crisis: The West and the rest
- Hunger, inequality and Marx in today’s globalised world
- Linguistic borders don’t separate, they fortify
- Global crisis shows our ‘mixed’ economy isn’t such a bad idea
- How US is nationalising bungling of capitalists
- Why Indians stash money abroad
- How to enforce dual diesel prices
- India’s ‘embarrassment of riches’ gets IMF worried
- Why the inflation monster refuses to be tamed easily
- What really led to collapse of WTO talks in Geneva

