Monday, Jul 13, 2020 | Last Update : 11:34 AM IST

111th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra25442714032510289 Tamil Nadu138470895321966 Delhi112494899683371 Gujarat41906291982046 Karnataka3884315411686 Uttar Pradesh3647623334934 Telangana3467122482356 West Bengal3001318581932 Andhra Pradesh2916815412328 Rajasthan2439218103510 Haryana2124015983301 Madhya Pradesh1763212876653 Assam168071089541 Bihar1630511953125 Odisha13737875091 Jammu and Kashmir105135979179 Kerala7874409532 Punjab78215392199 Chhatisgarh4081315319 Jharkhand3760230831 Uttarakhand3537278647 Goa2453120714 Tripura206714212 Manipur16098960 Puducherry141873918 Himachal Pradesh121391610 Nagaland8453270 Chandigarh5594178 Arunachal Pradesh3601382 Meghalaya295452 Mizoram2311500 Sikkim164810
  Opinion   Edit  27 Oct 2018  SC reins in govt in the CBI affair

SC reins in govt in the CBI affair

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Oct 27, 2018, 12:16 am IST
Updated : Oct 27, 2018, 12:16 am IST

So far, the non-Congress Opposition had not shown an overtly keen fighting spirit in the Rafale affair, though many had issued pro forma statements.

The Supreme Court has also directed that the “interim director” appointed by the government after dislodging Mr Verma must not take any important steps or steps relating to policy, and in a sealed cover furnish details of all his actions to the apex court. (Photo: Asian Age)
 The Supreme Court has also directed that the “interim director” appointed by the government after dislodging Mr Verma must not take any important steps or steps relating to policy, and in a sealed cover furnish details of all his actions to the apex court. (Photo: Asian Age)

Institutional pushback against the decision of the Union government to immobilise the CBI if it wouldn’t do its bidding under director Alok Verma became evident on Friday with the Supreme Court giving a series of directions to restore sanity.

At about the same time, at short notice, the Opposition Congress Party was able to stage an energetic demonstration outside the virtually sealed office of the CBI in the national capital with the demand that the institutional capabilities of the CBI must not be compromised on the altar of crippling partisanship that the present government expected from the top agency in sensitive probes.

It is politically of interest that other Opposition parties also participated in the Congress-initiated programme although the party’s president Rahul Gandhi, who led from the front and courted arrest along with senior colleagues, sought to stress that Mr Verma had been dislodged from his position as director because he had indicated that he was readying the agency to probe the alleged corruption at the highest levels in the Rafale deal. So far, the non-Congress Opposition had not shown an overtly keen fighting spirit in the Rafale affair, though many had issued pro forma statements.

The apex court has directed that the probe ordered by the Central Vigilance Commission into the actions of the CBI director and its special director, who had mutually attacked one another on grounds of corruption — a course of action that suited the government which seemed overly keen to knock Mr Verma out of action — would be supervised by a retired judge of the top court.

This plainly means that the CVC and the government cannot play ducks and drakes with the investigation even if they are so inclined. Further, the CVC-ordered investigation, which the government conveniently used to send Mr Verma on forced leave, has to be completed in a fortnight, and cannot drag on for as long as it is convenient to keep the CBI director out in the cold.

The Supreme Court has also directed that the “interim director” appointed by the government after dislodging Mr Verma must not take any important steps or steps relating to policy, and in a sealed cover furnish details of all his actions to the apex court. In totality, the instructions of the top court at the first hearing of the case brought against his forced leave by Mr Verma, who has challenged the government’s bonafides as well as motives, appeared to rein in the regime.

It is to be hoped that the apex court also goes into the issue of the appointment of the controversial special director, and whether the CVC has the authority to send the director on forced leave.

Tags: alok verma, supreme court, central vigilance commission