Thursday, Jul 16, 2020 | Last Update : 08:29 PM IST

114th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra27564015261310928 Tamil Nadu1518201023102167 Delhi118645956993487 Karnataka4725318467933 Gujarat44648313462080 Uttar Pradesh41383257431012 Telangana3934225999386 Andhra Pradesh3545118378452 West Bengal34427206801000 Rajasthan2643719502530 Haryana2330617667319 Bihar2017313533157 Assam197551288953 Madhya Pradesh1964313908682 Odisha1489810476101 Jammu and Kashmir116666337206 Kerala9554463436 Punjab87995867221 Jharkhand4562248538 Chhatisgarh4556332420 Uttarakhand3785294850 Goa2951167418 Tripura228116043 Manipur170010800 Puducherry159688921 Himachal Pradesh134196610 Nagaland9023480 Chandigarh61945911 Arunachal Pradesh4911533 Meghalaya337462 Mizoram2381590 Sikkim222870
  Metros   Mumbai  13 Jan 2019  HC to Union: Reply to petition for safety of cine workers, technicians

HC to Union: Reply to petition for safety of cine workers, technicians

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Jan 13, 2019, 2:05 am IST
Updated : Jan 13, 2019, 2:05 am IST

The state government tried to shirk its responsibilities but the HC directed it to file an affidavit within three weeks.

Bombay high court
 Bombay high court

Mumbai: The Bombay high court has asked the state and Union government to file their affidavits pertaining to the petition for safety and security of cine workers and technicians. The petitioner, which is a NGO, said that these people work in horrible conditions and get no beneficial policies. The state government tried to shirk its responsibilities but the HC directed it to file an affidavit within three weeks.

A division bench of Chief Justice Naresh Patil and Justice N.M. Jamdar was hearing the petition filed by the association, raising the issue of safety and health of stuntmen and other technical and professional artistes working in cinema and television. The petition stated that these employees did not even get provident fund and thousands of workers and technicians who slogged long uninterrupted hours deserved access to social security systems and the highest attainable standards of health.

This week during the hearing, the petitioner’s lawyer pointed out fire incidents which had occurred in film and television studios and demonstrated the seriousness of the issue and informed the court that the petition had been filed in 2015 and ever since, no reply had been filed by the state government.

Assistant public prosecutor Nisha Mehra argued that The Cinema and Theatre Workers Act 1984 existed in the country and it was a central law which is why the state government could not do anything in the petition. She suggested that the petitioner needed to make the Centre a respondent in the petition and seek explanation.

Tags: bombay high court