Wednesday, Sep 23, 2020 | Last Update : 04:13 PM IST

182nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra122438091634833015 Andhra Pradesh6317495518215410 Tamil Nadu5473374919718871 Karnataka5268764233778145 Uttar Pradesh3588932895945135 Delhi2492592133045014 West Bengal2283021989834421 Odisha184122149379763 Telangana1726081419301042 Bihar169856155824870 Assam159320129130578 Kerala13863398720554 Gujarat1247671051913337 Rajasthan116881972841352 Haryana113075908841177 Madhya Pradesh108167836182007 Punjab99930754092860 Chhatisgarh8618347653680 Jharkhand7267358543626 Jammu and Kashmir65026421151024 Uttarakhand4177729000501 Goa2875322726360 Puducherry2319118065467 Tripura2227215441245 Himachal Pradesh124387836125 Chandigarh102987411123 Manipur9010683859 Arunachal Pradesh7385540813 Nagaland5544445110 Meghalaya4733252838 Sikkim2447190529 Mizoram158510120
  Metros   Mumbai  10 Feb 2018  Sanction not needed to try cops: CBI

Sanction not needed to try cops: CBI

Published : Feb 10, 2018, 6:41 am IST
Updated : Feb 10, 2018, 6:41 am IST

Around 13 hours later, the police found him nearly 120km from the point where he had escped and at that time, he was killed in an encounter.

Sohrabuddin Shaikh with his wife Kauser Bi.
 Sohrabuddin Shaikh with his wife Kauser Bi.

Mumbai: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) — while arguing against the discharge of police constable Dalpat Singh Rathod from Sohrabuddin Shaikh aide Tukaram Prajapati’s fake encounter case — on Friday told the Bombay high court that in the agency’s view, there was no need to take prior sanction to prosecute police officers who created false stories and executed a fake encounter.

Additional solicitor general (ASG) Anil Singh on behalf of the CBI argued before justice Revati Mohite-Dere that the tale narrated by the accused that Prajapati escaped from the train and was later killed in an encounter was a false story. The accused have claimed that on December 26, 2006, four policemen including constable Rathod were escorting Prajapati in a train from Ahmedabad to Udaipur. When the train reached Sarhad Chhapri Road at Ambaji village at around 3am, Prajapati asked to be taken to the washroom. Following this, Yudhvir Singh and Kartar Singh took him to the washroom where Prajapati threw chilli powder into their eyes and escaped from the train.


The accused claimed that there was an acute turn at a particular place due to which the train was running at a speed of 20 kmph and hence, Prajapati was able to escape.

Around 13 hours later, the police found him nearly 120km from the point where he had escaped and at that time, he was killed in an encounter. According to advocate Singh, a train ticket was planted in Prajapati’s pocket by the accused but the fact was that Prajapati never travelled in the train.

However, when justice Mohite-Dere asked advocate Singh how Prajapati reached the spot, the former replied that the CBI did not have any information about the same. Irked with this, the judge told him that he cannot provide information in isolation and needed to give the entire details of the incident.


Tags: sohrabuddin shaikh, bombay high court, dalpat singh rathod